IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v117y2020p19837-19843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interdependence and the cost of uncoordinated responses to COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • David Holtz

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Initiative on the Digital Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Michael Zhao

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Initiative on the Digital Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Seth G. Benzell

    (Initiative on the Digital Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866)

  • Cathy Y. Cao

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Initiative on the Digital Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Mohammad Amin Rahimian

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261)

  • Jeremy Yang

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Initiative on the Digital Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Jennifer Allen

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Avinash Collis

    (Initiative on the Digital Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712)

  • Alex Moehring

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Tara Sowrirajan

    (Computer Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139)

  • Dipayan Ghosh

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Yunhao Zhang

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Paramveer S. Dhillon

    (Initiative on the Digital Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109)

  • Christos Nicolaides

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Initiative on the Digital Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; School of Economics and Management, University of Cyprus, 2109 Aglantzia, Nicosia, Cyprus)

  • Dean Eckles

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Initiative on the Digital Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Sinan Aral

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Initiative on the Digital Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

Abstract

Social distancing is the core policy response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). But, as federal, state and local governments begin opening businesses and relaxing shelter-in-place orders worldwide, we lack quantitative evidence on how policies in one region affect mobility and social distancing in other regions and the consequences of uncoordinated regional policies adopted in the presence of such spillovers. To investigate this concern, we combined daily, county-level data on shelter-in-place policies with movement data from over 27 million mobile devices, social network connections among over 220 million Facebook users, daily temperature and precipitation data from 62,000 weather stations, and county-level census data on population demographics to estimate the geographic and social network spillovers created by regional policies across the United States. Our analysis shows that the contact patterns of people in a given region are significantly influenced by the policies and behaviors of people in other, sometimes distant, regions. When just one-third of a state’s social and geographic peer states adopt shelter-in-place policies, it creates a reduction in mobility equal to the state’s own policy decisions. These spillovers are mediated by peer travel and distancing behaviors in those states. A simple analytical model calibrated with our empirical estimates demonstrated that the “loss from anarchy” in uncoordinated state policies is increasing in the number of noncooperating states and the size of social and geographic spillovers. These results suggest a substantial cost of uncoordinated government responses to COVID-19 when people, ideas, and media move across borders.

Suggested Citation

  • David Holtz & Michael Zhao & Seth G. Benzell & Cathy Y. Cao & Mohammad Amin Rahimian & Jeremy Yang & Jennifer Allen & Avinash Collis & Alex Moehring & Tara Sowrirajan & Dipayan Ghosh & Yunhao Zhang & , 2020. "Interdependence and the cost of uncoordinated responses to COVID-19," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(33), pages 19837-19843, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:19837-19843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/117/33/19837.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:19837-19843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.