IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v117y2020p16267-16272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adherence to suicide reporting guidelines by news shared on a social networking platform

Author

Listed:
  • Steven A. Sumner

    (National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341)

  • Moira Burke

    (Facebook, Menlo Park, CA 94025)

  • Farshad Kooti

    (Facebook, Menlo Park, CA 94025)

Abstract

Rates of suicide in the United States are at a more than 20-y high. Suicide contagion, or spread of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors through exposure to sensationalized and harmful content is a well-recognized phenomenon. Health authorities have published guidelines for news media reporting on suicide to help prevent contagion; however, uptake of recommendations remains limited. A key barrier to widespread voluntary uptake of suicide-reporting guidelines is that more sensational content is perceived to be more engaging to readers and thus enhances publisher visibility and engagement; however, no empirical information exists on the actual influence of adherence to safe-reporting practices on reader engagement. Hence, we conducted a study to analyze adherence to suicide-reporting guidelines on news shared on social media and to assess how adherence affects reader engagement. Our analysis of Facebook data revealed that harmful elements were prevalent in news articles about suicide shared on social media while the presence of protective elements was generally rare. Contrary to popular perception, closer adherence to safe-reporting practices was associated with a greater likelihood of an article being reshared (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10 to 1.27) and receiving positive engagement (“love” reactions) (AOR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.26). Mean safe-reporting scores were lower in the US than other English-speaking nations and variation existed by publisher characteristics. Our results provide empirical evidence that improved adherence to suicide-reporting guidelines may benefit not only the health of individuals, but also support publisher goals of reach and engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven A. Sumner & Moira Burke & Farshad Kooti, 2020. "Adherence to suicide reporting guidelines by news shared on a social networking platform," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(28), pages 16267-16272, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:16267-16272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/117/28/16267.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chloe Chang Sorensen & Mego Lien & Vicki Harrison & John J. Donoghue & Jeevanjot Singh Kapur & Song Hi Kim & Nhi Thi Tran & Shashank V. Joshi & Sita G. Patel, 2022. "The Tool for Evaluating Media Portrayals of Suicide (TEMPOS): Development and Application of a Novel Rating Scale to Reduce Suicide Contagion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Sheikh Shoib & Miyuru Chandradasa & Mahsa Nahidi & Tan Weiling Amanda & Sonia Khan & Fahimeh Saeed & Sarya Swed & Marianna Mazza & Marco Di Nicola & Giovanni Martinotti & Massimo Di Giannantonio & Ais, 2022. "Facebook and Suicidal Behaviour: User Experiences of Suicide Notes, Live-Streaming, Grieving and Preventive Strategies—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Sonika Raj & Abhishek Ghosh & Babita Sharma & Sonu Goel, 2022. "Do online media adhere to the responsible suicide reporting guidelines? A cross sectional study from India," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(1), pages 44-54, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:16267-16272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.