IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v116y2019p7154-7156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opinion: Research community needs to better appreciate the value of sex-based research

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole C. Woitowich

    (Women’s Health Research Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611)

  • Teresa K. Woodruff

    (Women’s Health Research Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole C. Woitowich & Teresa K. Woodruff, 2019. "Opinion: Research community needs to better appreciate the value of sex-based research," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116(15), pages 7154-7156, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:116:y:2019:p:7154-7156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/116/15/7154.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Lanu & Smith, Daniel Scott & Hofstra, Bas & McFarland, Daniel A., 2022. "Gendered knowledge in fields and academic careers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    2. Jinjing Wu & Jia Chen & Zhen Li & Boshen Jiao & Peter Muennig, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Variation of the Association between Urbanicity and Incident Hypertension among Chinese Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:116:y:2019:p:7154-7156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.