IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v116y2019p19231-19236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Signaling the trustworthiness of science

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen Hall Jamieson

    (Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104)

  • Marcia McNutt

    (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC 20001)

  • Veronique Kiermer

    (Public Library of Science, San Francisco, CA 94111)

  • Richard Sever

    (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724)

Abstract

Trust in science increases when scientists and the outlets certifying their work honor science’s norms. Scientists often fail to signal to other scientists and, perhaps more importantly, the public that these norms are being upheld. They could do so as they generate, certify, and react to each other’s findings: for example, by promoting the use and value of evidence, transparent reporting, self-correction, replication, a culture of critique, and controls for bias. A number of approaches for authors and journals would lead to more effective signals of trustworthiness at the article level. These include article badging, checklists, a more extensive withdrawal ontology, identity verification, better forward linking, and greater transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen Hall Jamieson & Marcia McNutt & Veronique Kiermer & Richard Sever, 2019. "Signaling the trustworthiness of science," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116(39), pages 19231-19236, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:116:y:2019:p:19231-19236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/116/39/19231.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, 2021. "Abuse of ORCID’s weaknesses by authors who use paper mills," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6119-6125, July.
    2. Rolf Lidskog & Adam Standring, 2024. "Invaluable invisibility: academic housekeeping within the IPCC," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(10), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2022. "How research institutions can make the best of scandals – once they become unavoidable," Post-Print hal-03908837, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:116:y:2019:p:19231-19236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.