IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mve/journl/v50y2024i2p87-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination of the Money Line Market for National Football League Games

Author

Listed:
  • M.H. Tuttle

    (Sam Houston State University)

  • Zane Pion

    (Sam Houston State University)

  • Donald Bumpass

    (Sam Houston State University)

Abstract

We examine market efficiency of the opening and closing money lines (wager on the winner of a game) for National Football League (NFL) games from 2007 through 2016. A simple analysis shows that inefficiencies exist in the opening and closing NFL money line market. Inefficiencies in the closing money lines suggests that the money line market fails to completely adjust and eliminate some of these inefficiencies. Further, the market adjustments suggest that bookmakers may take advantage of bettors’ biases to earn profits in excess of their commission. The results here support the existence of a reverse favorite-longshot bias, where bettors tend to overbet the favorite and underbet the underdog. These inefficiencies, however, are unpredictable and vary by season. Finally, utilizing game-specific factors, it appears that the presence of precipitation creates opportunities to earn profits when betting on the favorite.

Suggested Citation

  • M.H. Tuttle & Zane Pion & Donald Bumpass, 2024. "An Examination of the Money Line Market for National Football League Games," Journal of Economic Insight, Missouri Valley Economic Association, vol. 50(2), pages 87-117.
  • Handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:50:y:2024:i:2:p:87-117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:50:y:2024:i:2:p:87-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cullen Goenner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mveaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.