IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mve/journl/v46y2020i2p47-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personality and Risk Aversion in Representative Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Attila Cseh

    (Valdosta State University)

  • Luke Jones

    (Valdosta State University)

Abstract

We use a laboratory experiment to analyze how personality characteristics influence risk preference with and without randomly assigned anonymous dependents. In three treatments with dependents, we randomly group participants into pairs - a decision maker and a dependent. The decision maker of each pair faces a choice between a certain payment and a binary lottery of higher expected value. The decision maker role within each pair is either determined by random assignment (RANDOM), or earned based on performance in a pregame (MERIT1, MERIT2). We compare choices in the three treatments to choices of decision makers without a dependent (SELF). We find that individuals with higher scores on agreeableness are more likely to choose the safe option when their decision affects a dependent. We find that higher scores on neuroticism are associated with increased probability of safe choice if the decision maker position is earned (instead of assigned randomly).

Suggested Citation

  • Attila Cseh & Luke Jones, 2020. "Personality and Risk Aversion in Representative Decision Making," Journal of Economic Insight, Missouri Valley Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 47-93.
    • Handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:46:y:2020:i:2:p:47-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:46:y:2020:i:2:p:47-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cullen Goenner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mveaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.