IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mve/journl/v40y2014i2p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Committee Bias and Market Inefficiency, Evidence from the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher C. Douglas

    (University of Michigan-Flint)

Abstract

Various studies find evidence that the NCAA men’s basketball section committee exhibits bias in the seeding of teams for the “March Madness” basketball tournament. Fewer studies examine whether March Madness betting markets are efficient. Using a decade’s worth of NCAA and point spread data that allow for additional sources of bias than what has been already considered, I find evidence that the selection committee does exhibit bias when seeding teams. Not all of these biases are eliminated by the betting market, which seems to allow for profit opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher C. Douglas, 2014. "Committee Bias and Market Inefficiency, Evidence from the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament," Journal of Economic Insight, Missouri Valley Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:40:y:2014:i:2:p:1-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:40:y:2014:i:2:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cullen Goenner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mveaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.