IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2012060040115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of economic efficiency of process improvement in food packaging

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Hron

    (Katedra řízení, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Praha 6, Česká republika)

  • Tomáš Macák

    (Katedra řízení, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Praha 6, Česká republika)

  • Andrea Jindrová

    (Katedra řízení, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Praha 6, Česká republika)

Abstract

In general, we make gains in process by the three fundamental ways. First, we define or redefine our process in a strategic sense. Second, once defined or redefined, we commence process operations and use process control methods to target and stabilize our process. Third, we use process improvement methods, as described in this paper, along with process control to fully exploit our process management and/or technology. Process improvement is focused primarily in our subprocesses and sub-subprocesses. Process leverage is the key to process improvement initiatives. This means that small improvements of the basic manufacturing operations can have (with the assumption of mass repetition of the operation) a big impact on the functioning of the whole production unit. The complexity within even small organizations, in people, products, and processes, creates significant challenges in effectively and efficiently using these initiatives tools. In this paper we are going to place process purposes in the foreground and initiatives and tools in the background as facilitator to help accomplish process purpose. Initiatives and tools are not the ends we are seeking; result/outcomes in physical, economics, timeliness, and customer service performance matter. In the paper process boundaries (in a generic sense) are set by our process purpose and our process definition. Process improvement is initiated within our existing process boundaries. For example, in a fast-food restaurant, if we define our cooking process around a frying technology, then we provide process improvements within our frying technology. On the other hand, if we are considering changing to a broiling technology, then we are likely faced with extensive change, impacting our external customers, and a process redefinition may be required.The result / aim of the paper are based on the example of the process improving of a food packaging quality. Specifically, the integration of two approaches: statistical process control (SPC) and quality control based on stochastic principle. Both approaches are represented in the quality control of food packaging. Based on the obtained data set of weld strength packaging films (in units of MPa) was tested by the statistical hypothesis that innovation in the implementation of the weld has a positive impact on the quality of the finished weld. From basic data analysis, which focused on the assessment of normality in the distribution of values of the parameter using the Shapiro-Wilkes test it can be seen (on Figure) that the values of A or B (is not part of the figure) welds have not a normal distribution. For the purpose of the statistical hypothesis testing Wilcoxon's test was used, which is similar to the nonparametric t-test used for dependent samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Hron & Tomáš Macák & Andrea Jindrová, 2012. "Evaluation of economic efficiency of process improvement in food packaging," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(4), pages 115-120.
  • Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2012060040115
    DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260040115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201260040115.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201260040115.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11118/actaun201260040115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2012060040115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mendelu.cz/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.