IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2011059020279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globalisation of accounting standards and competitive posture of Indian companies

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Singhania

    (Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110007, India)

  • P. K. Gupta

    (Centre for Management Studies, JMI University, New Delhi-110025, India)

Abstract

Unification of the global financial reporting system is essential to enable comparability of financial statements at the international level in post crisis competitive environment. IFRSs are increasingly gaining acceptance as global accounting standards. With European Union adopting the IFRS in 2005, as on date over 116 countries have already either converged their accounting standards with IFRS or adopted IFRS as such and many more are in the process. Countries refusing IFRS are likely to be viewed as more risky by the international investors thereby affecting the inflow of capital to such countries. In India, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) the apex body dealing with accounting standards has declared the roadmap of IFRS convergence in a phased manner from April 1, 2011. Our paper highlights the status of Indian accounting standards converging to IFRS as of now. In addition, a full fledged theoretical framework is developed showcasing, the convergence timeline, the major differences in the treatment of select items under these two alternative accounting environments, exact stage at which the Indian accounting standards are today in view of the announced convergence to IFRS and the legal and regulatory issues in converging to IFRS in India. We investigate the case of 150 odd firms and show the impact of convergence on financial ratios and the related valuation concerns. Finally, we indicate the strategic implications of IFRS adoption to Indian companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Singhania & P. K. Gupta, 2011. "Globalisation of accounting standards and competitive posture of Indian companies," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(2), pages 279-290.
    • Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2011059020279
    DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159020279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201159020279.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201159020279.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11118/actaun201159020279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary E. Barth & Wayne R. Landsman & Mark H. Lang, 2008. "International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 467-498, June.
    2. Hollis Ashbaugh & Morton Pincus, 2001. "Domestic Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the Predictability of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 417-434, December.
    3. Anne B. Fosbre & Ellen M. Kraft & Paul B. Fosbre, 2009. "The Globalization Of Accounting Standards : Ifrs Versus Us Gaap," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 3(1), pages 61-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hela Turki & Senda Wali & Younes Boujelbène, 2016. "IFRS, Environnement Informationnel et Pertinence des chiffres comptables," Post-Print hal-01901074, HAL.
    2. Stephen A. Zeff & Christopher W. Nobes, 2010. "Commentary: Has Australia (or Any Other Jurisdiction) ‘Adopted’ IFRS?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(2), pages 178-184, June.
    3. Donal Byard & Ying Li & Yong Yu, 2011. "The Effect of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Financial Analysts’ Information Environment," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 69-96, March.
    4. Fang, Yiwei & Fornaro, James & Li, Lingxiang & Zhu, Yun, 2018. "The impact of accounting laws and standards on bank risks: Evidence from transition countries," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 103-118.
    5. Irene Karamanou & George P. Nishiotis, 2009. "Disclosure and the Cost of Capital: Evidence from the Market's Reaction to Firm Voluntary Adoption of IAS," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7‐8), pages 793-821, September.
    6. Georgakopoulos, Georgios & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Huang, Chen & Patsika, Victoria, 2022. "The impact of IFRS adoption on IPOs management earnings forecasts in Australia," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    7. Federica Doni & Ross Taplin & Roberto Verona, 2016. "Comparability of Company Accounts Using IFRS and US GAAP: Empirical Evidence of European and US Financial Statements," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 1-54, November.
    8. Tsalavoutas, Ioannis & André, Paul & Evans, Lisa, 2012. "The transition to IFRS and the value relevance of financial statements in Greece," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 262-277.
    9. Macías, Marta & Muiño, Flora, 2011. "Examining dual accounting systems in Europe," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 51-78, March.
    10. Gatluak Gach Chuol Thony & Anthony Duku Peter, 2023. "The Impact of Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standard on Quality of Accounting Information in South Sudan: A Case Study of Kenya Commercial Bank and Cooperative Bank," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 19(1), pages 28-48.
    11. Najeb Masoud, 2017. "The effects of mandatory IFRS adoption on financial analysts’ forecast: Evidence from Jordan," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1290331-129, January.
    12. Marra, Antonio & Mazzola, Pietro & Prencipe, Annalisa, 2011. "Board Monitoring and Earnings Management Pre- and Post-IFRS," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 205-230, June.
    13. Arslan-Ayaydin, Özgür & Chen, Shimin & Ni, Serene Xu & Thewissen, James, 2022. "Is cross-listing a panacea for improving earnings quality? The case of H- and B-share firms in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Benjamin Poulard & Lionel Touchais, 2013. "Bilan de l’application des IAS/IFRS : vers une amélioration de la qualité de l’information financière ?," Post-Print hal-03125414, HAL.
    15. Palea, Vera, 2013. "IAS/IFRS and Financial Reporting Quality: Lessons from the European Experience," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201330, University of Turin.
    16. Ahmed, Kamran & Chalmers, Keryn & Khlif, Hichem, 2013. "A Meta-analysis of IFRS Adoption Effects," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 173-217.
    17. Jaeyon Chu & Kyongsun Heo & Jinhan Pae, 2019. "Does a Firm’s Corporate Governance Enhance the Beneficial Effect of IFRS Adoption?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Nobes, Christopher & Stadler, Christian, 2018. "Investigating international differences in financial reporting: Data problems and some proposed solutions," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(6), pages 602-614.
    19. Obeng, Victoria A. & Ahmed, Kamran & Miglani, Seema, 2020. "Integrated reporting and earnings quality: The moderating effect of agency costs," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    20. Stuart Mestelman & Emad Mohammad & Mohamed Shehata, 2015. "The Convergence of IFRS and U.S. GAAP: Evidence from the SEC's Removal of Form 20‐F Reconciliations," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 190-211, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2011059020279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mendelu.cz/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.