IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jqyfkm/doi10.1432-87108y2017i1-2p373-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renegotiating European Budgetary Constraints to Make Convergence Possible and «End» the Southern Question. A «New Productive Offer» in the Mediterranean to Rescue the South from Growing Divergence

Author

Listed:
  • A. Del Monaco

Abstract

The Stability Pact, in particular after its tightening in 2011-2 through Fiscal Compact, the Two Pack and the Six Pack, greatly reduced the possibility of EU Member States to make a debt to invest. Italy, in the 2017 Budget Programme Document, commits itself to gradually lower its net borrowing up to zeroing in 2019; consequently, it reduces its investments, particularly in Southern Italy. An actual example is the postponement of the 2014-2020 Development and Cohesion Fund (DCF) expenditure, that is a fund almost entirely (80%) intended for Southern Italy: 2016 Stability Law puts off spending by 29.7 billion (out of 38.7 billion of DCF funding) until 2019. The 2017 Budget Law increases DCF's total allocation to 46.6 billion, while at the same time postpones DCF spending of 35.1 billion (out of 46.6 billion) after 2020. DCF is needed in the South because it contributes to the financing of important works, such as the railway line Naples- Bari-Lecce-Taranto, the Salerno-Reggio-Calabria rail backbone, the Messina- Catania-Palermo rail backbone and the Sassari-Olbia motorway. Such works cost 13.6 billion: as of 30 June 2016, 2.38 billion have been spent; to complete them, further 11.27 billion are needed. Current EU budgetary constraints reckon that the deficit/GDP ratio is the debt to complete such works. On the contrary, the net debt for the Italian contribution to support EMU countries in financial difficulties has been cut off by the deficit/GDP ratio: such contribution from 2010 to 2014 was 60 billion. In this situation, an alarm is raised and a solution is suggested. The possibility of making a deficit for investing could be totally cancelled if the German proposal for a new European directive on a second sovereign debt bail in was approved: the banks in the Countries of South-Europe should sell their respective government bonds that exceed 25% of their net assets, the spreads of South-European bonds towards the «Bund» would rise, interest rates in South-Europe States would rise and it would be difficult to make a deficit to invest. Otherwise, such a EU directive should be avoided, investments should not be totally taken into account in the deficit/GDP ratio and all the resources available should be allocated for the creation of a self-centred production area in the South. It is necessary a reform of the productive structure of Southern Italy, based on three interventions: the connection through Potenza of the Tyrrhenian rail backbone to the Adriatic rail backbone; the realization of three polycentric cities, one of Apulia and Lucania, one Calabrian and one in the bipole Messina-Reggio-Calabria; the transformation of the ports of Gioia Tauro, Taranto and Crotone into the headquarters of world logistics.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Del Monaco, 2017. "Renegotiating European Budgetary Constraints to Make Convergence Possible and «End» the Southern Question. A «New Productive Offer» in the Mediterranean to Rescue the South from Growing Divergence," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1-2, pages 373-396.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/87108:y:2017:i:1-2:p:373-396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1432/87108
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1432/87108
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adriano Giannola & Riccardo Padovani & Carmelo Petraglia, 2015. "Spending Review e divari regionali in Italia," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 129-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Menghini & S. Terzi, 2016. "A Multidimensional Performance Indicator to Analyze Firms' Competitiveness: a Suggestion and an Empirical Study for Italy," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 71-96.
    2. Luca Bianchi & Carmelo Petraglia & Gaetano Vecchione, 2019. "Europe-Italy, North-South: The Double Gap," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3-4, pages 673-687.
    3. G. Talamo & F. Guarneri, 2016. "A New Phenomenon: Backshoring and the Italian Case," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2-3, pages 405-432.
    4. Adriano Giannola & Carmelo Petraglia & Domenico Scalera, 2017. "Residui fiscali, bilancio pubblico e politiche regionali," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(2), pages 33-57.
    5. G.L.C. Provenzano, 2016. "European and National Cohesion Policies and a Lack of Convergence: the Case of Southern Italy," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 177-226.
    6. A. Giannola & C. Petraglia, 2016. "Southern Italy and «Crisis» of Regional Policies," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 97-120.
    7. F. Martinelli, 2019. "Social Services: The Gaps between North and South Italy. A System of Differentiated Citizenship and an Obstacle to Our Country's Development," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 41-80.
    8. L. Cappellani & R. Padovani & G. Servidio, 2015. "Why Southern Italy needs a Specific Industrial Policy," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3-4, pages 645-676.
    9. Salvatore Villani, 2019. "Differentiated Fiscal Regionalism. The Privileges of the Autonomy and the Problems of Southern Italy," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3-4, pages 963-996.
    10. Flavia Martinelli, 2020. "Lost in Translation? Regional Policy from National Strategy to EU Competitive Framework," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1-2, pages 85-123.
    11. Petraglia, Carmelo & Pierucci, Eleonora & Scalera, Domenico, 2020. "Interregional redistribution and risk sharing through public budget. The case of Italy in times of crisis (2000–2016)," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 162-169.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/87108:y:2017:i:1-2:p:373-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.