IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j1t56u/doi10.2382-35522y2011i2p181-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liquid Labyrinths: Water Services Among Reforms, Counter-Reforms, Rulings and Referendum

Author

Listed:
  • Mariachiara Alberton

Abstract

In the last decades, water resources have been regulated in Italy through different legislative acts that have drawn a picture in which shadows and uncertainties prevail. Apart from innovative and pioneering laws, sometimes anticipating some of the ones approved at the European level and result of a shared vision and a common effort toward the coordination of different levels of water governance, a labyrinth of norms beside a knot of administrative bodies constitutes the present scenario. This article recalls the main principles and reforms which have marked the water sector in Italy since the last decade of the past century and leads the reader throughout «a liquid labyrinth» of stratified norms, referendum and rulings, identifying the existing institutional lacks and suggesting possible guidelines for the current reforming process.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariachiara Alberton, 2011. "Liquid Labyrinths: Water Services Among Reforms, Counter-Reforms, Rulings and Referendum," Economia dei Servizi, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 181-196.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j1t56u:doi:10.2382/35522:y:2011:i:2:p:181-196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.2382/35522
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2382/35522
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intergovernmental relations; water; environmental federalism; H77; Q50.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j1t56u:doi:10.2382/35522:y:2011:i:2:p:181-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.