IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/raee88/v10y2018i3p106-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common Metamodel of Questionnaire Model and Decision Tree Model

Author

Listed:
  • Mirza Suljic
  • Edin Osmanbegovic
  • ?eljko Dobrovi?

Abstract

The subject of this paper is metamodeling and its application in the field of scientific research. The main goal is to explore the possibilities of integration of two methods: questionnaires and decision trees. The questionnaire method was established as one of the methods for data collecting, while the decision tree method represents an alternative way of presenting and analyzing decision making situations. These two methods are not completely independent, but on the contrary, there is a strong natural bond between them. Therefore, the result reveals a common meta-model that over common concepts and with the use of metamodeling connects the methods: questionnaires and decision trees. The obtained results can be used to create a CASE tool or create repository that can be suitable for exchange between different systems. The proposed meta-model is not necessarily the final product. It could be further developed by adding more entities that will keep some other data.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirza Suljic & Edin Osmanbegovic & ?eljko Dobrovi?, 2018. "Common Metamodel of Questionnaire Model and Decision Tree Model," Research in Applied Economics, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 106-120, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:raee88:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:106-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/rae/article/view/13540
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/rae/article/view/13540
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:raee88:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:106-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/rae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.