IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jsss88/v1y2014i1p44-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demons of Transitional Democracies: Politics of Insults and Acrimony in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Kwame Asamoah

    (University of Ghana Business School)

  • Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah

    (University of Ghana Business School)

  • Alex Osei-Kojo

    (University of Ghana Business School)

Abstract

There is a general perception that Ghana has achieved remarkable success in democratic consolidation by conducting six general elections in the Fourth Republic without widespread violence since 1992. Yet, the kind of tensions and acrimony that surround her elections are issues that cannot be glossed over. The 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana paved the way for free speech and expression, which has been strengthened by the repeal of the Criminal Libel Law. Most political actors tend to abuse the freedom of speech enshrined in the Constitution by using abusive words and insulting their political opponents especially on the airwaves and during political campaigns. The persistent use of intemperate language affects the quality of policy discourse and also creates tension at every election year. Faced with the use of indecorous language at every election year, a common feature of elections in Ghana is the numerous appeals for peace from all sections of society. The use of indecent words by political actors thus poses a serious threat to Ghana¡¯s democratic dispensation as it can escalate into serious conflict with social, political and economic ramifications. This article examines how the use of indecent language can be detrimental to the developmental agenda of the country. The paper adopts content analysis to examine some of the statements by some key stakeholders during the 2012 general elections. A major finding of the study is that there is excessive use of abusive words on airwaves and political campaigns. Another finding of the study is that election periods in Ghana is characterized by clarion calls for peace and calming down tensions. The article recommends that key political actors must set practical leadership example, for their supporters to emulate by using decorous words before, during and after each election.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwame Asamoah & Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah & Alex Osei-Kojo, 2014. "Demons of Transitional Democracies: Politics of Insults and Acrimony in Ghana," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 44-56, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jsss88:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:44-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsss/article/view/4725/3863
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsss/article/view/4725/3863
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sniderman, Paul M. & Tetlock, Philip E. & Glaser, James M. & Green, Donald Philip & Hout, Michael, 1989. "Principled Tolerance and the American Mass Public," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 25-45, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Tobin Grant & Thomas J. Rudolph, 2003. "Value Conflict, Group Affect, and the Issue of Campaign Finance," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(3), pages 453-469, July.
    2. Sara B. Hobolt & Wouter Van der Brug & Claes H. De Vreese & Hajo G. Boomgaarden & Malte C. Hinrichsen, 2011. "Religious intolerance and Euroscepticism," European Union Politics, , vol. 12(3), pages 359-379, September.
    3. Mikael Hjerm & Maureen A. Eger & Andrea Bohman & Filip Fors Connolly, 2020. "A New Approach to the Study of Tolerance: Conceptualizing and Measuring Acceptance, Respect, and Appreciation of Difference," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 897-919, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jsss88:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:44-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.