Author
Listed:
- Vinicius Eduardo Gargaro Silva
- Fábio Luiz Bim Cavalieri
- Márcia Aparecida Andreazzi
- José Eduardo Gonçalves
- José MaurÃcio Gonçalves dos Santos
- Danieli Aparecida Bóbbo Moreski
- Laura Paulino Mardigan
- Tales da Silveira Faria
Abstract
Imported breeds raised in tropical countries demand greater use of chemical control of ectoparasites, however, this practice can compromise the results of biotechnologies of reproduction. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of chemical residues of tick or their metabolites in the blood and in the follicular fluid and to verify the in vitro embryo production (IVEP) of Wagyu cows, raised in a tropical country, submitted to fluazuron based tick treatment. Twenty adult Wagyu bovine females were used, donors of oocytes, divided into 2 groups- G1 - animals that were not submitted to tick control and G2, animals that were submitted to chemical control of ticks with fluazuron based product (2.5 mg kg-1 of body weight). After application (D0), all cows were submitted to estrous synchronization and, in four moments (D12, D33, D54 and D75) the aspirations of the follicular fluid from the dominant follicles were performed, the oocytes were collected for IVEP and were collected blood samples for extraction and analysis of the presence of chemical residues, using GC-MS. Plasma residues of fluazuron were detected up to 54 days after application of the tick, but no residues were detected in the follicular fluid. Group 1 had a higher number of total and viable oocytes (p<0.0001), however, the viability rate and the blastocyst rate was lower (p<0.0001), showing that the use of ticks compromised IVEP.
Suggested Citation
Vinicius Eduardo Gargaro Silva & Fábio Luiz Bim Cavalieri & Márcia Aparecida Andreazzi & José Eduardo Gonçalves & José MaurÃcio Gonçalves dos Santos & Danieli Aparecida Bóbbo Moreski & Laura P, 2022.
"Fluazuron Influences the in vitro Production Embryos of Wagyu Cow,"
Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:mth:jas888:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:1-11
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.