IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijsw88/v4y2017i1p22-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Current Status of Social Work Science and Research: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications for Post-Soviet Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Shorena Sadzaglishvili

Abstract

This paper offers a review of the major literature about the modern status of social work as a science within the American and European contexts and its implications for post-Soviet countries where social work is an emerging profession. It identifies the most appropriate types of social work research (e.g. translational research) that can be used for bridging the science and service communities to directly affect the provision of services across different social work sectors. It also provides historical analysis of the various organizations within European and American social work to show their pivotal role in improving the scope and quality of social work research and consequently, social work as a science. And finally it suggests ways of increasing visibility of social work as science in post-Soviet countries through development of sound social work doctoral programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Shorena Sadzaglishvili, 2017. "The Current Status of Social Work Science and Research: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications for Post-Soviet Countries," International Journal of Social Work, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 22-38, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ijsw88:v:4:y:2017:i:1:p:22-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijsw/article/view/11157
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijsw/article/view/11157
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Currie, Melissa & King, Gillian & Rosenbaum, Peter & Law, Mary & Kertoy, Marilyn & Specht, Jacqueline, 2005. "A model of impacts of research partnerships in health and social services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 400-412, November.
    2. Morrissey, Erin & Wandersman, Abraham & Seybolt, Diana & Nation, Maury & Crusto, Cindy & Davino, Katie, 1997. "Toward a framework for bridging the gap between science and practice in prevention: A focus on evaluator and practitioner perspectives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 367-377, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walter, Alexander I. & Helgenberger, Sebastian & Wiek, Arnim & Scholz, Roland W., 2007. "Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: Design and application of an evaluation method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 325-338, November.
    2. Hamzeh, J. & Pluye, P. & Bush, P.L. & Ruchon, C. & Vedel, I. & Hudon, C., 2019. "Towards an assessment for organizational participatory research health partnerships: A systematic mixed studies review with framework synthesis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 116-128.
    3. Barbara Fallon & Joanne Filippelli & Tara Black & Nico Trocmé & Tonino Esposito, 2017. "How Can Data Drive Policy and Practice in Child Welfare? Making the Link in Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Smith, Hayden P., 2020. "Evaluating The Implementation Of The Prison Rape Elimination Act (Prea): A “Lessons Learned” Approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. King, Gillian & Currie, Melissa & Smith, Linda & Servais, Michelle & McDougall, Janette, 2008. "A framework of operating models for interdisciplinary research programs in clinical service organizations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 160-173, May.
    6. King, Gillian & Servais, Michelle & Kertoy, Marilyn & Specht, Jacqueline & Currie, Melissa & Rosenbaum, Peter & Law, Mary & Forchuk, Cheryl & Chalmers, Heather & Willoughby, Teena, 2009. "A measure of community members' perceptions of the impacts of research partnerships in health and social services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 289-299, August.
    7. Piper, Douglas & Stein-Seroussi, Al & Flewelling, Robert & Orwin, Robert G. & Buchanan, Rebecca, 2012. "Assessing state substance abuse prevention infrastructure through the lens of CSAP's Strategic Prevention Framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 66-77.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijsw88:v:4:y:2017:i:1:p:22-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijsw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.