IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijrd88/v2y2015i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Topography of Possible Hungarian Renewable Energy Regions and Cities: A Possible Interpretation Based on Three Models

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Kramos

    (University of Debrecen)

Abstract

The main task of my research was to present the process of developing renewable energy regions (RER) in Western Europe and that of it in Hungary. In regional science one always has to face the problem of accurately defining the concept, size, institution and the function of regions, because of manifold region definitions. The 3 types are as follows: Sustainable Energy Action Planning, the Modelling region and the risk based regional developing. In my research I evaluated KAT report data published by Hungarian Energy and Public Utility Regulatory Authority, thus assigning settlements constituting potential RERs in Hungary. Results could demonstrate renewable energy cities, micro-regional and regional spatial initiations started their institutionalization process before the national formal codification of RERs. A few typical examples were found in the Western Hungarian Region, but some of them can be found in Central and Northern Hungary as well as in the Northern Great Plain.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Kramos, 2015. "The Topography of Possible Hungarian Renewable Energy Regions and Cities: A Possible Interpretation Based on Three Models," International Journal of Regional Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ijrd88:v:2:y:2015:i:1:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijrd/article/view/7022/6185
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijrd/article/view/7022/6185
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Altieri, Miguel A. & Masera, Omar, 1993. "Sustainable rural development in Latin America: building from the bottom-up," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 93-121, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miguel Altieri, 1999. "Applying Agroecology to Enhance the Productivity of Peasant Farming Systems in Latin America," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 197-217, September.
    2. Frisvold, George B. & Condon, Peter T., 1998. "The convention on biological diversity and agriculture: Implications and unresolved debates1," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 551-570, April.
    3. Bárbara Ayala-Orozco & Julieta A. Rosell & Juliana Merçon & Isabel Bueno & Gerardo Alatorre-Frenk & Alfonso Langle-Flores & Anaid Lobato, 2018. "Challenges and Strategies in Place-Based Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration for Sustainability: Learning from Experiences in the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Tiziano Gomiero & Davide Pettenella & Giang Phan Trieu & Maurizio Paoletti, 2000. "Vietnamese Uplands: Environmental and Socio-Economic Perspective of Forest Land Allocation and Deforestation Process," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 119-142, June.
    5. Miguel A. Altieri, 2000. "Developing sustainable agricultural systems for small farmers in Latin America," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 24(2), pages 97-105, May.
    6. Frisvold, George B. & Sullivan, John & Raneses, Anton, 2003. "Genetic improvements in major US crops: the size and distribution of benefits," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 109-119, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijrd88:v:2:y:2015:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijrd .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.