Author
Listed:
- Kazi Enamul Hoque
- Mosa Fatema Zohora
- Reazul Islam
- Ahmed Abdullah Ali Al-Ghefeili
Abstract
This study primarily attempts to compare primary education system between Bangladesh and Malaysia and then compares government initiatives of both countries to integrate special needs children into main stream primary education. Literature review and secondary data were used for this comparison. Findings show that student enrolment rate in both countries is almost same. But there are significant differences in the drop-out rate, infrastructure and government-budget. The percentage of boys¡¯ enrolment is higher than girls¡¯ in Malaysia but girls enrollment is a little higher in Bangladesh. Girls generally outperform boys in Malaysia but in Bangladesh boys perform better. Teachers-pupil ratio is 1-12.6 for Malaysia but it is very high 1-50 in bangladesh.? The Government of Malaysia has taken different measures such as incentives for special needs children and teachers as per head count, allocation of special budgets for facilities improvement and accomodation, supplying of available teachers and special needs students¡¯ friendly infrastructure. In Bangldesh, the Government has made the policy and? instructed school management to be supportive towards special needs children. But the Government effort can be considered as planning stage rather than implementation. The Government is also planned to recruit teachers with special needs training but no effective initiative is visible.? Comparing to Malaysia, Bangladesh has to face many challenges to reach to the stage where Malaysia is now. The identified issues need further attention of the researchers and policymakers to be clarified. ? Key words- inclusive education, Primary education, Malaysia
Suggested Citation
Kazi Enamul Hoque & Mosa Fatema Zohora & Reazul Islam & Ahmed Abdullah Ali Al-Ghefeili, 2013.
"Inclusive Education into Mainstream Primary Education: A Comparative Study between Malaysia and Bangladesh,"
International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(3), pages 81-92, June.
Handle:
RePEc:mth:ijld88:v:3:y:2013:i:3:p:81-92
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijld88:v:3:y:2013:i:3:p:81-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.