IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/bmsmti/v12y2021i1p16-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privatisation and Workers’ Compensation in Privatised State-Owned Enterprises in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Mehadi Mamun
  • Mamun Billah

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of privatisation on workers’ compensation in privatised state-owned enterprises in Bangladesh. The study employs five case studies using a qualitative approach. Studying multiple cases is considered more reliable as it permits replication and extension. The qualitative approach helps to build a holistic picture, which allows for the assembling of a comprehensive and complete report of the issues under investigation. The research finds that workers’ compensations in most privatised case study organisations are less than their counterparts in comparable state-owned and privately-owned organisations. The findings have important implications for the privatisation programmes in Bangladesh as the study focuses on workers who are the major workforce of privatised organisations and generates qualitative data that provides greater insight into the impact of privatisation on workers’ compensation in Bangladesh.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehadi Mamun & Mamun Billah, 2021. "Privatisation and Workers’ Compensation in Privatised State-Owned Enterprises in Bangladesh," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(1), pages 16-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:bmsmti:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:16-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms/article/download/18070/14022
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/18070
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:devpol:v:26:y:2008:i:3:p:275-308 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:dgr:rugsom:04c31 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Boubakri, Narjess & Cosset, Jean-Claude & Guedhami, Omrane, 2004. "Privatization, corporate governance and economic environment: Firm-level evidence from Asia," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 65-90, January.
    4. Truong, Dong Loc & Lanjouw, Gerrit Jan & Lensink, Bernardus Wander, 2004. "The impact of privatisation on firm performance in a transition economy: the case of Vietnam," Research Report 04C31, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    5. Truong Dong Loc & Ger Lanjouw & Robert Lensink, 2006. "The impact of privatization on firm performance in a transition economy: The case of Vietnam," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 14(2), pages 349-389, April.
    6. repec:bla:devpol:v:22:y:2004:i:1:p:5-29 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Vickers, John & Yarrow, George, 1988. "Regulation of privatised firms in Britain," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2-3), pages 465-472, March.
    8. A. Geske Dijkstra, 2002. "The Effectiveness of Policy Conditionality: Eight Country Experiences," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 33(2), pages 307-334, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quang Minh Nguyen, 2023. "Impact of privatization on firm performance in Vietnam: A Staggered Difference-in-Differences analysis with heterogeneous treatment effects," Documentos de Trabajo EH-Valencia (DT-EHV) 2303, Economic History group at the Universitat de Valencia.
    2. Nguyen Van Tan & Trinh Quoc Trung, 2019. "Has Equitization Actually Led to Improve Firm Performance in a Transition Economy?," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(3), pages 402-418, March.
    3. Ngo My Tran & Ann Jorissen & Walter Nonneman, 2015. "Privatization of Vietnamese Firms and Its Effects on Firm Performance," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(2), pages 202-217, February.
    4. Qing Li & Long Hai Vo, 2021. "Intangible Capital and Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Vietnamese Enterprises," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 21-02, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    5. Mehadi Mamun, 2021. "The Impact of Foreign Aid Conditionality on Poverty Alleviation in Bangladesh: A Recipient’s Perspective," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(3), pages 151-161, December.
    6. Choon-Yin Sam, 2013. "Partial privatisation and the role of state owned holding companies in China," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(3), pages 767-789, August.
    7. Uddin, Shahzad, 2009. "Rationalities, domination and accounting control: A case study from a traditional society," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 782-794.
    8. Sangeetha Gunasekar & Jayati Sarkar, 2014. "Does autonomy matter in state owned enterprises? Evidence from performance contracts in India," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2014-034, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    9. Vu, Tien Manh & Yamada, Hiroyuki, 2020. "Convergence of public and private enterprise wages in a transition economy: Evidence from a distributional decomposition in Vietnam, 2002–2014," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(1).
    10. Liu, Yi & Lahiri, Sajal & Liu, Tianqi, 2018. "Optimal Partial Privatization in the Presence of Foreign Competition: The Role of Efficiency Differentials and Unemployment," MPRA Paper 91471, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Jan 2019.
    11. Mathur, Ike & Banchuenvijit, Wanrapee, 2007. "The effects of privatization on the performance of newly privatized firms in emerging markets," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 134-146, May.
    12. Willy McCourt, 2018. "Towards “cognitively complex” problem‐solving: Six models of public service reform," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S2), pages 748-768, September.
    13. Lai Trung Hoang & Cuong Cao Nguyen & Baiding Hu, 2017. "Ownership Structure and Firm Performance Improvement: Does it Matter in the Vietnamese Stock Market?," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 36(4), pages 416-428, December.
    14. Michael Böheim, 2011. "Die Privatisierung öffentlichen Eigentums als Instrument der Wirtschaftspolitik: Privat- versus Staatseigentum an Unternehmen – theoretische Grundlagen," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 84(9), pages 593-604, September.
    15. Enrico Santarelli & Hien Thu Tran, 2016. "Diversification strategies and firm performance in Vietnam," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 24(1), pages 31-68, January.
    16. Ghulam, Yaseen, 2017. "Long-run performance of an industry after broader reforms including privatization," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 745-768.
    17. Hu, Jinshuai & Jiang, Haiyan & Wu, Yibing, 2023. "How does privatization affect cash dividends? Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    18. Ramstetter, Eric D. & Ngoc, Phan Minh, 2013. "Productivity, ownership, and producer concentration in transition: Further evidence from Vietnamese manufacturing," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 28-42.
    19. Ngo My Tran & Walter Nonneman & Ann Jorissen, 2014. "Government Ownership and Firm Performance: The Case of Vietnam," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 4(3).
    20. Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro & Li, Cheng, 2021. "State ownership and internationalization: The advantage and disadvantage of stateness," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:bmsmti:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:16-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.