IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ber888/v13y2023i1p36-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investments in Morocco and Turkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Ayoub Bendriouch
  • Kamil Uslu

Abstract

Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) can have a positive effect on the development of the economic and social potential of emerging countries provided that they make efforts to attract appropriate investors. Among developing countries, we are interested to analyze FDI attractiveness in Türkiye and Morocco and proceed with a comparative analysis between these two countries.Very few empirical studies present an overview of FDI determinants and how they can influence the FDI attractiveness of Türkiye and Morocco separately. Consequently, the contribution of this paper is to compare FDI inflows in these countries and then identify the determinants that impact their FDI attractiveness. For this purpose, we used an ARDL econometric model in both countries over the period 1980 to 2020.Our results show that there is an important similarity between the impacting factors on FDI flows in the short run in both countries. Openness and inflation have positive effects in both countries, while market size has a negative impact on FDI attractiveness. Credit, however, has a positive effect only in Türkiye but no significance in Morocco. On the other hand, there is less similarity between Türkiye and Morocco in the long run, since only GDP has a significant and positive impact in both countries. Inflation has a significant and negative impact only in Morocco, and human capital is positively impactful only in Türkiye, while openness and credit have a significant and negative impact also only in Türkiye. This difference between the long-run results in both countries shows that FDI determinants play a more effective role in attracting FDI inflows in Türkiye than in Morocco, which substantiates the difference in the level of FDI inflows that each country gets.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayoub Bendriouch & Kamil Uslu, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investments in Morocco and Turkiye," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 13(1), pages 36-56, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:36-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/download/20675/16086
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/20675
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noorbakhsh, Farhad & Paloni, Alberto & Youssef, Ali, 2001. "Human Capital and FDI Inflows to Developing Countries: New Empirical Evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1593-1610, September.
    2. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    3. Malsha Mayoshi Rathnayaka Mudiyanselage & Gheorghe Epuran & Bianca Tescașiu, 2021. "Causal Links between Trade Openness and Foreign Direct Investment in Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evans, Olaniyi, 2020. "Fiscal Discipline, Financial Development & Economic Growth in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 99242, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Pacific K. T. Yapatake, 2017. "The Slow growth of Foreign Direct Investment in Central African Republic," CEREDEC Working Papers 17/001, Centre de Recherche pour le Développement Economique (CEREDEC).
    3. Milin Ioana Anda & Bușan Gabriela & Ecobici Nicolae & Abdul Rehman, 2023. "Economic Growth Drivers in Romania: Evidence from a NARDL Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Vu Manh Hoai Nguyen & Tin Huu Ho & Luan Huynh Nguyen & An Thi Ha Pham, 2023. "The Impact of Trade Openness on Economic Stability in Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Yapatake Kossele Thales Pacific, 2017. "Slow Growth of Foreign Direct Investment in Central African Republic," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(6), pages 1435-1446, December.
    6. Warren Moraghen & Boopen Seetanah & Noor Ul Haq Sookia, 2023. "The impact of exchange rate and exchange rate volatility on Mauritius foreign direct investment: A sector‐wise analysis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 208-224, January.
    7. Olusanya, Oluwakorede, 2020. "Asymmetric Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Manufacturing Sector Performance in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 113029, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Sabariah Nordin & Gairuzazmi B. Mat Ghani, 2015. "Trade Liberalization and Foreign Direct Investment in Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 7(6), pages 11-23.
    9. Chaudhry, Naveed Iqbal & Mehmood, Mian Saqib & Mehmood, Asif & Mujtaba, Bahaudin G., 2014. "Exchange Rate, Market Size and Human Capital Nexus Foreign Direct Investment – A Bound Testing Approach for Pakistan," MPRA Paper 58177, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Karasoy, Alper, 2022. "Is innovative technology a solution to Japan's long-run energy insecurity? Dynamic evidence from the linear and nonlinear methods," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Bruce Morley, 2009. "A Comparison of Two Alternative Monetary Approaches to Exchange Rate Determination over the Long-Run," International Econometric Review (IER), Econometric Research Association, vol. 1(2), pages 63-76, April.
    12. Bloch, Harry & Rafiq, Shuddhasattwa & Salim, Ruhul, 2015. "Economic growth with coal, oil and renewable energy consumption in China: Prospects for fuel substitution," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 104-115.
    13. Villanthenkodath, Muhammed Ashiq & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, 2021. "Does economic growth respond to electricity consumption asymmetrically in Bangladesh? The implication for environmental sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    14. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hoang, Thi Hong Van & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 199-212.
    15. Noraida, A.W. & Abdul-Rahim, A.S. & Othman, Mohd, 2017. "The Impact of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) Practices on Primary Timber-Based Production in Peninsular Malaysia," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 51(2), pages 143-154.
    16. Georgios Bertsatos & Plutarchos Sakellaris & Mike G. Tsionas, 2022. "Extensions of the Pesaran, Shin and Smith (2001) bounds testing procedure," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 605-634, February.
    17. Md.Yousuf & Raju Ahmed & Nasrin Akther Lubna & Shah Md. Sumon, 2019. "Estimating the Services Sector Impact on Economic Growth of Bangladesh: An Econometric Investigation," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(2), pages 62-72, June.
    18. Nasreen, Samia & Anwar, Sofia & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2017. "Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian economies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1105-1122.
    19. Muhammad Shafiullah & Ravinthirakumaran Navaratnam, 2016. "Do Bangladesh and Sri Lanka Enjoy Export-Led Growth? A Comparison of Two Small South Asian Economies," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 17(1), pages 114-132, March.
    20. Shuyang Chen, 2021. "The Urbanisation Impacts on the Policy Effects of the Carbon Tax in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:36-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Technical Support Office to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.