IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ajfa88/v1y2009i2p163-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination of Home Advantage (Bias) Argument in the Indian Financial Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay Seghal
  • Neeta Tripathi

Abstract

In this paper we examine if Domestic Financial Institutional Investors (DFIs) have any home advantage (Bias) compared to Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) for both the equity and debt segments of the Indian capital market. We find that both the DFIs and FIIs follow a positive feedback trading mechanism chasing stock market returns. However, FIIs seem to be reacting faster compared to DFIs in case of equity market. This may be owing to the fact that the former have international expertise and greater resources and play a dominant role in this segment of capital market as shown by their share in the trading volume. In contrast, the DFIs lead the market returns which in turn attract the FIIs thus supporting home advantage (bias) argument. Interestingly, the DFIs, unlike in equity market, play a more important role in debt market trading activities. Our results point at greater debt market inefficiency in the Indian context, which may be a reflection of the relatively underdeveloped nature of this market. Key Words- Home advantage (bias), Domestic Financial Institutional Investors, Foreign Institutional Investors, Market returns, Equity market, Debt Market.JEL Classifications- G100, G140

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay Seghal & Neeta Tripathi, 2009. "An Examination of Home Advantage (Bias) Argument in the Indian Financial Markets," Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, Macrothink Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 163174-1631, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ajfa88:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:163-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ajfa/article/download/74/304
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ajfa/article/view/74
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frankel, Jeffrey A & Schmukler, Sergio L, 2000. "Country Funds and Asymmetric Information," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(3), pages 177-195, July.
    2. Brennan, Michael J & Cao, H Henry, 1997. "International Portfolio Investment Flows," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(5), pages 1851-1880, December.
    3. Frankel, Jeffrey A., 1982. "In search of the exchange risk premium: A six-currency test assuming mean-variance optimization," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 255-274, January.
    4. Hasan, Iftekhar & Simaan, Yusif, 2000. "A rational explanation for home country bias," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 331-361, June.
    5. Tesar, Linda L. & Werner, Ingrid M., 1995. "Home bias and high turnover," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 467-492, August.
    6. Calvo, Guillermo A. & Mendoza, Enrique G., 2000. "Rational contagion and the globalization of securities markets," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 79-113, June.
    7. Kang, Jun-Koo & Stulz, Rene M., 1997. "Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 3-28, October.
    8. Grinblatt, Mark & Keloharju, Matti, 2000. "The investment behavior and performance of various investor types: a study of Finland's unique data set," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 43-67, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shujing Li & Mr. Hamid Faruqee & Isabel K. Yan, 2004. "The Determinants of International Portfolio Holdings and Home Bias," IMF Working Papers 2004/034, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Daly, Kevin & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2013. "The determinants of home bias puzzle in equity portfolio investment in Australia," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 34-42.
    3. Hyuk Choe & Bong-Chan Kho & Rene M. Stulz, 2001. "Do Domestic Investors Have More Valuable Information About Individual Stocks Than Foreign Investors?," NBER Working Papers 8073, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Jonathan Batten & Xuan Vinh Vo, 2010. "The determinates of equity portfolio holdings," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(14), pages 1125-1132.
    5. Lin, Anchor Y., 2009. "Law, culture and investment performance: A cross-country analysis," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 323-341.
    6. Rui Albuquerque & Gregory Bauer & Martin Schneider, 2004. "International Equity Flows and Returns: A Quantitative Equilibrium Approach," International Finance 0405006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Barron, John M. & Ni, Jinlan, 2008. "Endogenous asymmetric information and international equity home bias: The effects of portfolio size and information costs," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 617-635, June.
    8. Abdioglu, Nida & Khurshed, Arif & Stathopoulos, Konstantinos, 2013. "Foreign institutional investment: Is governance quality at home important?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 916-940.
    9. Chan, Kalok & Menkveld, Albert J. & Yang, Zhishu, 2006. "Are Domestic Investors Better Informed than Foreign Investors? : Evidence from the Perfectly Segmented Market in China," Serie Research Memoranda 0004, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    10. Kang, Hyung Cheol & Lee, Dong Wook & Park, Kyung Suh, 2010. "Does the difference in valuation between domestic and foreign investors help explain their distinct holdings of domestic stocks?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2886-2896, December.
    11. Ning Zhu, 2002. "The Local Bias of Individual Investors," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm272, Yale School of Management, revised 01 Sep 2009.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9772 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Jordi Mondria & Thomas Wu, 2013. "Imperfect financial integration and asymmetric information: competing explanations of the home bias puzzle?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 310-337, February.
    14. Gonçalves, Walter & Eid, William, 2017. "Sophistication and price impact of foreign investors in the Brazilian stock market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 102-139.
    15. Rui Albuquerque & Gregory Bauer & Martin Schneider, 2004. "Characterizing Asymmetric Information in International Equity Markets," International Finance 0405005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Kim, Jaemin & Yoo, Sean Sehyun, 2009. "Market liberalization and foreign equity portfolio selection in Korea," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 206-220, July.
    17. Dahlquist, Magnus & Robertsson, Göran, 2001. "Foreigners Trading and Price Effects Across Firms," CEPR Discussion Papers 3033, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Liljeblom, Eva & Loflund, Anders, 2005. "Determinants of international portfolio investment flows to a small market: Empirical evidence," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 211-233, July.
    19. Dahlquist, Magnus & Robertsson, Göran, 2001. "Foreigners´ Trading and Price Effects Across Firms," SIFR Research Report Series 1, Institute for Financial Research.
    20. Juan Carlos Hatchondo, 2005. "Asymmetric information and the lack of international portfolio diversification," Working Paper 05-07, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
    21. Thomas Jeanjean & Hervé Stolowy & Michael Erkens, 2010. "Really “Lost in translation”? The economic consequences of issuing an annual report in English," Post-Print hal-00479511, HAL.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ajfa88:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:163-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ajfa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.