Author
Listed:
- Nobutoshi Kitaura
(Economist, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance; Former Director of Policy Evaluation Office, Ministry of Finance; Former Associate Professor, Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University)
- Syohei Kyohtani
(Former Researcher, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)
- Takuto Nagashima
(Former Researcher, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)
- Kensaku Morita
(Former Researcher, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)
- Tatsuo Sakamoto
(Former Researcher, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)
- Tatsuya Sugiura
(Economist, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)
- Ryo Ishida
(Economist, Policy Planning and Research Division, Ministry of Finance)
Abstract
There are various underlying reasons why social security expenditures grow faster than the economy: e.g., per-capita healthcare expenditures grow faster than per-capita GDP (mainly caused by an increase of medical costs to attain more sophisticated treatments which reflect technological progress); the bigger the population share of the elderly, the higher the average per-capita expenditures or the more frequent usage of services become (the age effect); and not only per-capita average expenditures but also the number of social security recipients continue to increase due to longevity and the retirement of baby boomers. This paper, in the context of social security expenditures that are expected to grow faster than the economy, addresses how benefits and burdens for social security in Japan change with various demographic and economic assumptions by constructing a simultaneous equation model that covers healthcare, long-term care and pensions. Our findings reveal the followings. (1) If the estimation is made under the assumptions of the old population projection of 2002 and the current policies that have already been scheduled, the cumulative changes of social security benefits and burdens from 2006 to 2025 will be 2.3% and 4.0% of nominal GDP, respectively. (2) Using the new population projection of 2006 instead of the old one, we find that changes of benefits and burdens are 3.2% and 4.5% respectively; which is mainly due to the increase in the elderly population in the new population projection. (3) If the economy remains sluggish, the change in social security burdens is likely to be 5%. This paper also compares our estimation results with the two Japanese government estimates: the Ministry of Health, Labor and Wealth estimate (2006) in the main text; and the National Commission final report (2008) in the appendix.
Suggested Citation
Nobutoshi Kitaura & Syohei Kyohtani & Takuto Nagashima & Kensaku Morita & Tatsuo Sakamoto & Tatsuya Sugiura & Ryo Ishida, 2011.
"Structure of the Social Security Model and Simulation Results,"
Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 7(2), pages 337-384, July.
Handle:
RePEc:mof:journl:ppr014c
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr014c. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.