IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mje/mjejnl/v15y2019i4225-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasingly Complex Techno-Digital Realities in the Dynamics of Scientific Discourse

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey A. Kravchenko

Abstract

The article analyzes how factors of accelerating and complicating development of science and technology lead to changes in people's living conditions and, consequently, scientific discourse. The stage of industrial modernization was dominated by monodisciplinary knowledge with pronounced boundaries, which was rather functional for analyzing the realities of specific spheres of human life under the conditions of relatively slow development of the social and natural worlds. Scientists sought to identify "solid" technological, social, and economic correlations, to substantiate "universal" laws of socium and nature in the context of the mechanical picture of the world. However, the acceleration and increasing complexity of the development of science and technology have contributed to start the transition from monodisciplinary to interdisciplinary knowledge. The state of affairs changed significantly in the period of 'reflexive modernization' (Beck, Giddens, Lash), which was expressed in scientific 'turns' – qualitative changes in the production of knowledge in the form of permanently complicating scientific discourse. The ‘turns’ implied a different methodology of cognition, the rejection of "solid" correlations and "universal" laws, the transition to the interpretation of "liquid" realities (Bauman), the reflexion concerning the "runaway world" (Giddens). The post-modernization, the becoming of 'digital society' mark a radically different trend in the systems of knowledge production and the transition to a post-disciplinary scientific discourse.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey A. Kravchenko, 2019. "Increasingly Complex Techno-Digital Realities in the Dynamics of Scientific Discourse," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(4), pages 225-237.
  • Handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:15:y:2019:i:4:225-237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.mnje.com/mje/2019/v15-n04/mje_2019_v15-n04-a27.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergey A. Kravchenko, 2018. "The Becoming of Non-Linear Knowledge - New Risks, Vulnerabilities, and Hopes," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(4), pages 191-202.
    2. Ashtiani, Mehrdad & Azgomi, Mohammad Abdollahi, 2015. "A survey of quantum-like approaches to decision making and cognition," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 49-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ismaël Rafaï & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci & Irina Basieva & Andrei Khrennikov, 2022. "The triple-store experiment: a first simultaneous test of classical and quantum probabilities in choice over menus," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 387-406, March.
    2. Boyer-Kassem, Thomas & Duchêne, Sébastien & Guerci, Eric, 2016. "Testing quantum-like models of judgment for question order effect," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 33-46.
    3. Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci, 2016. "Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 479-510, November.
    4. Steve J. Bickley & Ho Fai Chan & Sascha L. Schmidt & Benno Torgler, 2021. "Quantum-Sapiens: The Quantum Bases for Human Expertise, Knowledge, and Problem-Solving (Extended Version with Applications)," CREMA Working Paper Series 2021-14, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    5. Morales, Vicente, 2024. "Social Mechanics," SocArXiv my7v4, Center for Open Science.
    6. Maroussia Favre & Amrei Wittwer & Hans Rudolf Heinimann & Vyacheslav I Yukalov & Didier Sornette, 2016. "Quantum Decision Theory in Simple Risky Choices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29, December.
    7. Ferro, Giuseppe M. & Kovalenko, Tatyana & Sornette, Didier, 2021. "Quantum decision theory augments rank-dependent expected utility and Cumulative Prospect Theory," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Stan Lipovetsky, 2023. "Quantum-like Data Modeling in Applied Sciences: Review," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, February.
    9. Veselin Draskovic & Sergey A. Kravchenko & Milica Delibasic, 2021. "Synergy of Neoliberalism, Alternative Institutions and Transitional Crisis," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(57), pages 534-534.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:15:y:2019:i:4:225-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nikola Draskovic Jelcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.mnje.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.