IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mir/mirbus/v3y2013i2p89-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Brazilian Program for Family Farming Assistance and the Diffusion of Technical Patterns: An Institutional Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Maísa Gomide Teixeira

    (Posdoctoral Visiting Researcher,Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil)

Abstract

This article discusses the diffusion process of technical practices in order to understand how PRONAF-Credit (National Program for Family Farming Assistance) impacted the institutionalization of new technological standards in family farms in the region of Maringá, PR, from 1997 to 2006. We aim to check the institutional assumption that proclaims itself in favor of coercion for institutionalization. Based on a cross-sectional research design with a longitudinal perspective analysis, interviewees were separated into two main groups representing different periods of involvement and types of relationship with the program. These procedures allowed comparing the interpretive schemes of farmers in different situations of dependency with the program. The premise is that dependence, as measured by whether or not the resources are used, implies stronger interpretive schemes in relation to the program and the techniques instructed. Comparison of the data allowed us to observe proximity between interpretive schemes of “quasi-experimental†and “control†groups, which reinforces evidence that there was internalization of the standards rather than just formal adoption. However, the results suggest that coercive diffusion in programs that aim to contribute perennially to their audiences should consider cultural background and relational aspects of people's context of reference. These aspects potentially can influence how coercion is interpreted, as they did in this case.

Suggested Citation

  • Maísa Gomide Teixeira, 2013. "The Brazilian Program for Family Farming Assistance and the Diffusion of Technical Patterns: An Institutional Approach," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(2), pages 89-103, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:89-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://thejournalofbusiness.org/index.php/site/article/view/77/76
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:89-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M Kabir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csmirus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.