IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/yejrnl/v1y2020i1p89-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extractivismos agropecuarios en tiempos de pandemia: flexibilizaciones, asimetrías, autoritarismos y otros efectos derrame

Author

Listed:
  • Tamara Artacker

    (Instituto de Estudios Ecuatorianos, Quito, Ecuador)

  • Jorge Campanini

    (Centro de Documentación e Información Bolivia, Cochabamba, Bolivia)

  • Eduardo Gudynas

    (Centro Latino Americano de Ecología Social (CLAES). Montevideo, Uruguay)

Abstract

En el contexto de la pandemia por Covid19, los gobiernos de América del Sur han mantenido los extractivismosagropecuarios (agrícolas, ganaderos y forestales). En unos casos se los presenta como solución a la caída de extractivismos en petróleo y minerales. En otros casos ocurren cambios entre distintos productos agropecuarios. Esta estrategia implica la persistencia de impactos sociales y ambientales, y acentúan las asimetrías entre actores empresariales y agricultores pequeños o campesinos. A pesar que en la crisis por la pandemia permitía promover una agricultura como proveedora de alimentos para atacar el componente nutricional entre los sectores más pobres, persistió la postura de concebirla como proveedora de mercancías de exportación, acentuándose los extractivismos. Se mantuvieron y en algunos casos se profundizaron los efectos derrame, tales como flexibilizaciones sociales, laborales y ambientales, y se fortalecieron políticas públicas que sostienen y blindan a los extractivismos.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamara Artacker & Jorge Campanini & Eduardo Gudynas, 2020. "Extractivismos agropecuarios en tiempos de pandemia: flexibilizaciones, asimetrías, autoritarismos y otros efectos derrame," Yeiya, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 1(1), pages 89-107, July-Dece.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:yejrnl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:89-107
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/y.v1i1.1303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/yeiya/article/view/1303/888
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/y.v1i1.1303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:yejrnl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:89-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.