IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/ijornl/v2y2021i1p23-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues in Quantitative Analysis and Security Studies Involving Muslims

Author

Listed:
  • Peter S. Henne

    (University of Vermont, United States.)

Abstract

There are very serious ethical and pragmatic issues in the quantitative and security study of Muslims. From an ethical perspective, many of these studies denigrate and stereotype Muslims. They also treat them as a problem to be solved, justifying and expanding US power. Pragmatically, it can be hard to collect detailed data on security issues in many Muslim countries, making conventional studies difficult. Yet, standard approaches to these problems are faulty. We cannot abandon positivist analysis, as well-done quantitative studies are actually the best tools we have to push back on negative stereotypes of Muslims. At the same time, we cannot ignore important security topics among Muslim states just because the data we have available is not ideal. Instead, I present a two-pronged approach that can address these issues without ignoring crucial aspects of international relations; scholars should follow best methodological practices to avoid ethical issues, and adopt new standards and novel tools to deal with imperfect data.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter S. Henne, 2021. "Issues in Quantitative Analysis and Security Studies Involving Muslims," International Journal of Religion, Wise Press, UK, vol. 2(1), pages 23-32, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:2:y:2021:i:1:p:23-32
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v2i1.1475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijor.co.uk/ijor/article/view/1475/1038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v2i1.1475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:ijornl:v:2:y:2021:i:1:p:23-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wise (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijor.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.