IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mic/tmpjrn/v16y2020i01p19-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Social Innovation Tools: Process-Oriented Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriella Metszősy

    (University of Miskolc)

Abstract

The aim of this paper to analyse the success factors of efficiency of social innovation and indicate the variables associated with the success factors in order to aid in decision making A number of success factors play an important part in adjusting to reach the optimal solution. The personality of the innovator, level of the innovation or the place of implementation can influence the choice and prioritizing of these factors. Identifying the forms and level of decisions in connection with success factors is the main focus of the paper, determining the presence of linked variables. A suggestion is formulated to increase the efficiency of decision making taking into consideration the applied decision methods and special features of the situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriella Metszősy, 2020. "Evaluating Social Innovation Tools: Process-Oriented Approach," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 16(01), pages 19-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:mic:tmpjrn:v:16:y:2020:i:01:p:19-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tmp.gtk.uni-miskolc.hu/volumes/2020/01/TMP_2020_01_03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denis Bouyssou, 1996. "Outranking Relations: Do They Have Special Properties?," Post-Print hal-02920213, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfandari, Laurent, 2004. "Choice Rules with Size Constraints for Multiple Criteria Decision Making," ESSEC Working Papers DR 04002, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    2. Dias, Luis C. & Lamboray, Claude, 2010. "Extensions of the prudence principle to exploit a valued outranking relation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 828-837, March.
    3. Jeremiah A. Lasquety-Reyes, 2021. "Computer Simulations of Ethics: the Applicability of Agent-Based Modeling for Ethical Theories," European Journal of Formal Sciences and Engineering Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 6, July-Dece.
    4. Hinloopen, Edwin & Nijkamp, Peter & Rietveld, Piet, 2004. "Integration of ordinal and cardinal information in multi-criteria ranking with imperfect compensation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 317-338, October.
    5. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 373-386, August.
    6. Bouyssou, Denis & Pirlot, Marc, 2005. "A characterization of concordance relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(2), pages 427-443, December.
    7. Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Slowinski, Roman, 1999. "Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 63-83, August.
    8. Xu, Xiaozhan & Martel, Jean-Marc & Lamond, Bernard F., 2001. "A multiple criteria ranking procedure based on distance between partial preorders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 69-80, August.
    9. Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Slowinski, Roman, 2001. "Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 1-47, February.
    10. Guitouni, Adel & Martel, Jean-Marc, 1998. "Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 501-521, September.
    11. Bouyssou, Denis & Pirlot, Marc, 2009. "An axiomatic analysis of concordance-discordance relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 468-477, December.
    12. Govindan, Kannan & Jepsen, Martin Brandt, 2016. "ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 1-29.
    13. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant, 2013. "Some remarks on ELECTRE TRI," Working Papers hal-00942310, HAL.
    14. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2015. "A consolidated approach to the axiomatization of outranking relations: a survey and new results," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 159-212, June.
    15. Bouyssou, Denis & Marchant, Thierry, 2015. "On the relations between ELECTRE TRI-B and ELECTRE TRI-C and on a new variant of ELECTRE TRI-B," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 201-211.
    16. Behzadian, Majid & Kazemzadeh, R.B. & Albadvi, A. & Aghdasi, M., 2010. "PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 198-215, January.
    17. repec:eur:ejesjr:338 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Oussama Raboun & Eric Chojnacki & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2023. "Dynamic-R: a “challenge-free” method for rating problem statements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 845-873, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social innovation; process-oriented framework; decision support;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mic:tmpjrn:v:16:y:2020:i:01:p:19-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vgtmihu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.