IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mfa/journl/v30y2022i1p17-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board Governance, Dividend Payout and Executive Compensation in Malaysian Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ravichandran K. Subramaniam

    (School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Malaysia.)

  • Khakan Najaf

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Sunway University, Malaysia.)

  • Murugasu Thangarajah

    (School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Malaysia.)

Abstract

Research Question: This study seeks to present and test how board governance mechanisms affect the relationship between a company's dividend payout and CEO compensation. Motivation: In the face of the significant payouts to directors and abundant literature on executive pay, there is scant evidence on board governance the relationship between executive compensation and the dividend payout policy of listed firms in emerging capital markets. The independent variable used in this study is the dividend payout ratio, which is the dividend per share divided by primary earnings per share before extraordinary items. A direct measure of the dependent variable is the total executive compensation, inclusive of fixed salaries and variable bonuses. The research is built based on these three key papers, Bhattacharyya et al. (2011); Smith and Watts (1992); Gaver and Gaver (1993). Idea: Building on Bhattacharyya et al. (2011), this study examines how the board governance relationship between a company's dividend payout and executive compensation in the context of a developing country. Data: Using a sample of 300 largest Malaysian public listed companies (PLCs) on Bursa Malaysia from 2008 until 2014. The data is from the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange, OSIRIS, DATASTREAM, BANKSCOPE databases, and the Malaysian Stock Performance Guide. Method/Tools: We test using the panel data. Findings: Our empirical results reveal three findings. First, our results suggest a direct relationship between dividend payout and executive compensation across all models. Our sub-sample analyses show that this phenomenon is limited to the non-government linked firms and non-family firms. Secondly, board governance shows that the Bumiputera, CEO-education, and non-executive directors are positively related to dividend payout. Lastly, the interaction between executive board compensation and the presence of Bumiputera has a negative relationship with the dividend payout. Contributions: The results of this study contribute to the growing scholarly work that examines board governance and the impact on dividend payout in an emerging market context.

Suggested Citation

  • Ravichandran K. Subramaniam & Khakan Najaf & Murugasu Thangarajah, 2022. "Board Governance, Dividend Payout and Executive Compensation in Malaysian Firms," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 30(1), pages 17-35.
    • Handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:30:y:2022:i:1:p:17-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mfa.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/v30_i1_a2_pg17-35.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Clifford Jr. & Watts, Ross L., 1992. "The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 263-292, December.
    2. Kanapathippillai, Sutharson & Johl, Shireenjit K. & Wines, Graeme, 2016. "Remuneration committee effectiveness and narrative remuneration disclosure," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 384-402.
    3. Conyon, Martin J & Murphy, Kevin J, 2000. "The Prince and the Pauper? CEO Pay in the United States and United Kingdom," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 110(467), pages 640-671, November.
    4. Marizah Minhat & Mazni Abdullah, 2014. "Executive compensation in government-linked companies: evidence from Malaysia," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(16), pages 1861-1872, June.
    5. Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya & Julie Ann Elston & Laura Rondi, 2011. "Agency Issues in a Family Controlled Corporate Governance Structure The Case of Italy," CERIS Working Paper 201106, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    6. Gaver, Jennifer J. & Gaver, Kenneth M., 1993. "Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-3), pages 125-160, April.
    7. Lucian Arye Bebchuk & Jesse M. Fried, 2003. "Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 71-92, Summer.
    8. Golec, Joseph H., 1994. "Compensation policies and financial characteristics of real estate investment trusts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-2), pages 177-205, January.
    9. Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2006. "Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7-8), pages 1034-1062.
    10. De Cesari, Amedeo & Ozkan, Neslihan, 2015. "Executive incentives and payout policy: Empirical evidence from Europe," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 70-91.
    11. Sharma, Vineeta, 2011. "Independent directors and the propensity to pay dividends," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 1001-1015, September.
    12. Conyon, Martin J. & He, Lerong, 2011. "Executive compensation and corporate governance in China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 1158-1175, September.
    13. Sharifah Nazatul Faiza Syed Mustapha Nazri & Malcolm Smith & Zubaidah Ismail, 2012. "The impact of ethnicity on auditor choice: Malaysian evidence," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 198-221, September.
    14. Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2006. "Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7‐8), pages 1034-1062, September.
    15. White, Lourdes Ferreira, 1996. "Executive compensation and dividend policy," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 335-358, July.
    16. Nikos Vafeas, 2003. "Length of Board Tenure and Outside Director Independence," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7‐8), pages 1043-1064, September.
    17. Ravichandran K. Subramaniam & Teh Chee Ghee & Murugasu Thangarajah, 2020. "Executive Compensation, Ownership Structure and Dividend Payout: Evidence from Malaysia," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 16(2), pages 47-75.
    18. Amitava Roy, 2015. "Dividend Policy, Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance: An Empirical Analysis of Indian Firms," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 8(1), pages 1-33, June.
    19. Nikos Vafeas, 2003. "Length of Board Tenure and Outside Director Independence," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30, pages 1043-1064.
    20. Bebchuk, Lucian A. & Fried, Jesse M., 2003. "Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem," Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics, Working Paper Series qt81q3136r, Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics.
    21. Alves, Paulo & Couto, Eduardo Barbosa & Francisco, Paulo Morais, 2016. "Executive pay and performance in Portuguese listed companies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 184-195.
    22. Warwick Anderson & Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya & Cameron Morrill & Helen Roberts, 2020. "Dividend payout and executive compensation: theory and evidence from New Zealand," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(S1), pages 1007-1022, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Jerry & Cahan, Steven F. & Emanuel, David, 2009. "Compensation committee governance quality, chief executive officer stock option grants, and future firm performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1507-1519, August.
    2. Clement Olalekan Olaniyi & Olaolu Richard Olayeni, 2020. "A new perspective into the relationship between CEO pay and firm performance: evidence from Nigeria’s listed firms," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 22(2), pages 250-277, December.
    3. Hui Liang James & Hongxia Wang, 2021. "Independent director tenure and dividends," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5-6), pages 1057-1091, May.
    4. Sharma, Vineeta, 2011. "Independent directors and the propensity to pay dividends," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 1001-1015, September.
    5. Lahlou, Ismail & Navatte, Patrick, 2017. "Director compensation incentives and acquisition performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Maadi Bakor Omar & Azhar B Abdul Rahman & Fathilatul Zakimi bin Abdul Hamid, 2018. "The Association between Corporate Governance and Disclosure of Audit Committee Characteristics: A Conceptual Model for the Saudi Listed Companies," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 325-335, July.
    7. Calcagno, R. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2004. "Capital Structure and Managerial Compensation : The Effects of Renumeration Seniority," Discussion Paper 2004-120, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Wang, Qiong & Qiu, Muqing, 2023. "Strength in numbers: Minority shareholders' participation and executives' pay-performance sensitivity," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Rahimah Mohamed Yunos Author_Email: rahim221@johor.uitm.edu.my & Malcolm Smith & Zubaidah Ismail & Syahrul Ahmar Ahmad, 2011. "Inside Concentrated Owners, Board Of Directors And Accounting Conservatism," Annual Summit on Business and Entrepreneurial Studies (ASBES 2011) Proceeding 2011-053-178, Conference Master Resources.
    10. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, July.
    11. Goh, Lisa & Gupta, Aditi, 2016. "Remuneration of non-executive directors: Evidence from the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 379-399.
    12. Georgeta Vintila & Stefan Cristian Gherghina, 2013. "Board of Directors Independence and Firm Value: Empirical Evidence Based on the Bucharest Stock Exchange Listed Companies," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 3(4), pages 885-900.
    13. Ying Dou & Sidharth Sahgal & Emma Jincheng Zhang, 2015. "Should Independent Directors Have Term Limits? The Role of Experience in Corporate Governance," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 44(3), pages 583-621, September.
    14. Ralf Winkler & Maximilian Behrmann, 2019. "Aufsichtsratsvergütung und Überwachungseffektivität: Empirische Befunde für börsennotierte Gesellschaften in Deutschland [Supervisory Board Compensation and Monitoring Effectiveness: Evidence from ," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 381-414, November.
    15. Muniandy, Balachandran & Hillier, John, 2015. "Board independence, investment opportunity set and performance of South African firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(PA), pages 108-124.
    16. Sun, Sophia Li & Habib, Ahsan, 2020. "Determinants and consequences of tournament incentives: A survey of the literature in accounting and finance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Hu, Fang & Tan, Weiqiang & Xin, Qingquan & Yang, Sixian, 2013. "How do market forces affect executive compensation in Chinese state-owned enterprises?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 78-87.
    18. C. José García Martín & Begoña Herrero, 2018. "Boards of directors: composition and effects on the performance of the firm," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1015-1041, January.
    19. Lin, Hsuan-Chu & Chou, Ting-Kai & Wang, Wen-Gine, 2012. "Capital structure and executive compensation contract design: A theoretical and empirical analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 209-224.
    20. Doaa Aly & Muath Abdelqader & Tamer K. Darwish & Arshad Hasan & Anna Toporkiewicz, 2024. "How organizational board compositions lead to a higher job satisfaction: an empirical analysis of US and UK companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 277-289, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Executive compensation; board governance; dividend payout; Malaysia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G35 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Payout Policy
    • J33 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods
    • N25 - Economic History - - Financial Markets and Institutions - - - Asia including Middle East

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:30:y:2022:i:1:p:17-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Capital Market Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.