IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/postke/v47y2024i4p795-822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative economic analysis vs moralistic tales: an application to the myth of frugality

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Rafael Ruiz

Abstract

In 2020 the European Union designed a stimulus programme aimed at supporting Member States’ economic recovery following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. Several countries were reluctant to endorse the programme rejecting the idea of fiscal expansion as a means of cushioning the impact of the health crisis. They dubbed themselves ‘the frugals’, a term extensively used in media coverage from then on. The narrative of thrifty versus profligate economies has been a leitmotiv in policy negotiations at the EU level despite the fact that no economic school of thought defines macroeconomic characteristics in terms of frugality or wastefulness. In this paper we analyze to what extent the economic behavior of European countries can be characterized along those lines by assessing observable economic indicators related to public and private indebtedness, fiscal income and spending, characteristics of the welfare state, the labor market and contributions to economic growth from internal and external demand. We draw from three main theoretical approaches in order to choose meaningful indicators for comparing different economic structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Rafael Ruiz, 2024. "Comparative economic analysis vs moralistic tales: an application to the myth of frugality," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 795-822, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:47:y:2024:i:4:p:795-822
    DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2023.2279555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2023.2279555
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01603477.2023.2279555?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:47:y:2024:i:4:p:795-822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MPKE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.