IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v59y2025i1p29-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thorstein Veblen and W. E. B. Du Bois’ Critiques of the Antebellum South: Merging Divergent Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Raphael Sassower

Abstract

In “The Theory of the Master Class: A Veblenian Perspective on the Antebellum South,” Jerry Phillips amplifies Thorstein Veblen’s insights about the evolution of class relations as profoundly dependent on slavery as a “predatory scheme,” a century after the publication of The Theory of the Leisure Class. Phillips says: “[b]y offering an incisive analysis of the historical career of ‘the predatory animus,’ The Theory of the Leisure Class asks us to imagine a future society in which peaceable values are predominant and predatory institutions are obsolete.” Invoking the work of W. E. B. Du Bois as Veblen’s counterpart critic of the day, I wish to counterbalance the critique of modern capitalism, which accounts for but is not limited to class relations as articulated by Karl Marx and Veblen. In doing so, I hope to tease out the notion of dividuation as the linchpin with which to articulate the essential role that enslavement plays in capitalism and to explain the ongoing expropriation and decimation of personhood in the present. The primary objective here is to contrast Veblen’s and Du Bois’ critical engagement with slavery and highlight the notion of dividuation to shed light on the extractive nature of American enslavement.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphael Sassower, 2025. "Thorstein Veblen and W. E. B. Du Bois’ Critiques of the Antebellum South: Merging Divergent Approaches," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 29-42, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:59:y:2025:i:1:p:29-42
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2025.2455654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2025.2455654
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2025.2455654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:59:y:2025:i:1:p:29-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.