IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v58y2024i4p1313-1328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commons’ Reasonable Value and the Gig Economy: Lessons for the Twenty-First Century

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah S. Klammer
  • Rodrigo Constantino Jeronimo
  • Eric A. Scorsone

Abstract

The gig economy has opened a new set of institutional arrangements in modern capital and labor markets. New and ongoing attempts exist to structure the legal and informal institutional arrangements through which these new markets operate. One example on the global stage is a research initiative called Fairwork, which attempts to create a template for evaluating platforms and building fair relationships between workers and companies. The question remains as to whether we have the tools to evaluate these new institutional arrangements. This article specifically focuses on the political economy contributions of Original Institutional Economics scholar John R. Commons, as expressed in his theory of reasonable value. We define four key criteria that underlie Commons’ theory of reasonable value. These criteria are then applied to the Fairwork project and its evaluative process to assess whether it meets the criteria of reasonable value and contributes to its establishment in solving the labor problems of the digital era. This will provide a potential pathway for considering other institutional arrangements in the new gig economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah S. Klammer & Rodrigo Constantino Jeronimo & Eric A. Scorsone, 2024. "Commons’ Reasonable Value and the Gig Economy: Lessons for the Twenty-First Century," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 1313-1328, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:58:y:2024:i:4:p:1313-1328
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2024.2418655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2024.2418655
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2024.2418655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:58:y:2024:i:4:p:1313-1328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.