IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v58y2024i4p1107-1141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-Evolution of Law and Economics—Judicial Sovereignty

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Paschall
  • Glen Atkinson

Abstract

John R. Commons’ Legal Foundations of Capitalism documented the co-evolution of law and economics. Commons reviewed legal cases that affected economic development. Courts had endorsed emerging business practices unleashing endogenous forces of change. Scarcity was the dominant feature of the pre-industrial economy, but Commons’ Stages of Capitalism demonstrated that the economy had evolved to industrial production. As industrialism became more dominant, production was potentially abundant. However, abundance was a source of instability. Stabilized scarcity policies relieving instability were confirmed by the judiciary. Judicial review established judicial sovereignty that Commons called “dictatorship of the courts.” Intangible property was legalized. Use value of property was replaced by exchange value. Edicts of the courts could supplant the work of the legislative and executive branches risking a movement toward the fascism of pre-war Italy. The economy continues to evolve. The cutting edge of the economy is knowledge-based production, which is not manufacturing commodities. It is about the design and use of technology for the application of ideas that are built on increasing returns and positive feedback (further sources of instability). Competition is different in these industries where market power is prominent. This will require policies to deal with market power.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Paschall & Glen Atkinson, 2024. "Co-Evolution of Law and Economics—Judicial Sovereignty," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 1107-1141, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:58:y:2024:i:4:p:1107-1141
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2024.2418261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2024.2418261
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2024.2418261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:58:y:2024:i:4:p:1107-1141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.