IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v58y2024i3p964-987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning for Fund Seekers’ Deception in Peer-to-Peer Lending

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Mesly
  • Silvester Ivanaj

Abstract

This article examines the likelihood of deception on the part of borrowers wishing to obtain credit from institutional or private lenders in Peer-to-Peer lending set-ups. In our first study, we identify five explanatory variables that account for nearly forty percent of the propensity to act deceitfully in such circumstances: a poor credit history, debt, risky behavior, and to a much lesser degree, irrational behavior and disconnection from the bundle of needs, goals, and preferences. For the second study, we remodeled the initial questionnaire to adapt it to the needs of lenders and borrowers who engage in on-line peer-to-peer lending, a growing business fueled in part by the COVID pandemic. We find that the three key psychological variables that help to assess the likelihood of deceitful behaviors and possible default on loan reimbursement—namely, risky behaviors, (ir)rationality, and (dis)connection—interact with each other to form a loop. This study presents two benefits: first, we provide evidence that it is to some degree possible to tighten control over lending practices in P2P settings. Second, we offer a new pragmatic tool to gauge potential borrowers’ deceit in the context of debt building, notably by combining psychological assessments with standard hard-data measures of risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Mesly & Silvester Ivanaj, 2024. "Planning for Fund Seekers’ Deception in Peer-to-Peer Lending," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 964-987, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:58:y:2024:i:3:p:964-987
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2024.2382048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2024.2382048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2024.2382048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:58:y:2024:i:3:p:964-987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.