IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v58y2024i3p852-870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Label, Same Vintage? Reassessing Participatory Islamic Banking in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Feisal Khan

Abstract

Islamic Banking and Finance (IBF) advocates relentlessly promote it as a more inclusive and less rapacious (i.e., “participatory”) alternative to conventional finance as it ostensibly eschews interest-based, collateralized debt in favor of Profit and Loss Sharing (PLS, or Islamic venture capitalism). The US$ three trillion global IBF industry, they argue, “invests” in a wide range of economically beneficial activities and expands the pool of eligible beneficiaries. IBF’s critics have long argued that it is “a distinction without a difference” that uses close analogues of conventional financial products (aka the “murabahah syndrome”), and equity participation (PLS) has an insignificant share of global IBF assets. However, between 2006–2020, Islamic banks in Pakistan (an IBF pioneer) seemingly shifted away from conventional debt-analogue products to PLS financing. A closer analysis of these “participatory” Pakistani IBF products confirms the Kuran Thesis—that IBF will invariably and continually emulate conventional banking due to unchangeable environmental factors—since the banks developed new PLS financial products that allowed them to avoid being seen as ribawi (usurious) banks without having to take on the risks associated with actual venture capitalism. IBF, therefore, continues to be a higher cost, murabahah syndrome, version of conventional banking.

Suggested Citation

  • Feisal Khan, 2024. "New Label, Same Vintage? Reassessing Participatory Islamic Banking in Pakistan," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 852-870, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:58:y:2024:i:3:p:852-870
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2024.2382028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2024.2382028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2024.2382028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:58:y:2024:i:3:p:852-870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.