IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v58y2024i2p619-626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The House Always Wins: Gambling as a Veblenian Social Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Luke Petach
  • J. Patrick Raines

Abstract

The unequal distribution of economic rewards under capitalism requires institutions that perpetuate “enabling myths” which justify the distribution as fair or natural. In this article, we argue that the rise in popularity of sports betting in the United States reflects an increasing reliance of neoliberal capitalism on one particular enabling myth: the belief in luck. Thorstein Veblen’s writing in The Theory of the Leisure Class suggests the belief in luck as a “minor myth” that helps sustain the grand marginalist myth at the heart of neoliberal capitalism: the myth of meritocracy. The belief in luck provides an alternative rationalization for unfavorable economic outcomes when meritocracy breaks down. Rather than resulting from systemic or individual failures incompatible with meritocratic logic, the belief in luck ascribes negative economic outcomes to an otherwise teleological or supernatural force. Gambling in general—and sports betting in particular—constitutes a Veblenian social practice that serves to inculcate the belief in luck, thereby aiding in the naturalization and justification of economic inequalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke Petach & J. Patrick Raines, 2024. "The House Always Wins: Gambling as a Veblenian Social Practice," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 619-626, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:58:y:2024:i:2:p:619-626
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2024.2344445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2024.2344445
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2024.2344445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:58:y:2024:i:2:p:619-626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.