IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v60y2024i13p3098-3116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Investors Underestimate the Risk of Asset Bubbles? ——Evidence from the Goodwill Bubbles of Chinese Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Haijian Zeng
  • Yuhuan Wu
  • Ling Lin

Abstract

We investigate the extent of investors’ awareness of the bubble risk of assets’ fundamental value by examining Chinese listed companies’ goodwill bubbles. We find that firms with larger goodwill have a higher possibility of goodwill impairment recognition in the future, indicating a higher bubble risk of companies’ assets fundamental. Next, we find that firms with more goodwill experience lower stock returns in subsequent 1–3 years, which means investors do not demand corresponding risk compensation and underestimate the goodwill bubble risk for these firms. Furthermore, we investigate five behavioral biases driving investors to underestimate the bubble risk. The results show that investors’ gambling preference for bubble assets is the key driver, while investors limited attention, extrapolation, opinion divergence, and earnings expectation are not applicable in our setting. Our study suggests that investors’ gambling preference is a channel through which the risk of companies’ assets fundamental bubble transmits to the stock market.

Suggested Citation

  • Haijian Zeng & Yuhuan Wu & Ling Lin, 2024. "Do Investors Underestimate the Risk of Asset Bubbles? ——Evidence from the Goodwill Bubbles of Chinese Listed Companies," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(13), pages 3098-3116, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:60:y:2024:i:13:p:3098-3116
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2024.2336072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2024.2336072
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2024.2336072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:60:y:2024:i:13:p:3098-3116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.