IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v58y2022i4p1176-1190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Absence of Controlling Shareholders and Litigation Risk: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Honghui Zhang
  • Ying Zou
  • Linyi Zhang
  • Haojun Xiong
  • Ziqin Xie

Abstract

Using 2003–2018 data from China, this study analyzes the effect of absence of controlling shareholders on litigation risk. The results show that companies without controlling owners face higher litigation risk, an association that exists mainly in respondent companies. Upon further analysis, we find that this negative effect is more pronounced when the ownership is highly dispersed, and less pronounced for companies with greater analyst followings. This study enriches litigation risk literature from the perspective of absence of controlling shareholders, and enlightens other related studies that focus on emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Honghui Zhang & Ying Zou & Linyi Zhang & Haojun Xiong & Ziqin Xie, 2022. "Absence of Controlling Shareholders and Litigation Risk: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 1176-1190, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:58:y:2022:i:4:p:1176-1190
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2021.1973422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1973422
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1973422?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lai, Jieji & Hu, Shiyang, 2024. "Bankruptcy judicial system reform and corporate financial litigation risk: A quasi-natural experiment in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:58:y:2022:i:4:p:1176-1190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.