IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v54y2018i14p3209-3234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Platform Externality, Asymmetric Information, and Counterfeit Deterrence in E-Commerce

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Miao
  • Danxia Xie
  • Weiqiang Zhong

Abstract

The fight against online sales of counterfeit goods has received much attention. To the best of our knowledge, existing literature on online counterfeiting lacks a theoretical framework. To fill this gap, this article proposes a two-period model with sellers, buyers, and a platform. We focus on the relationship among platform structure (characterized by the ratio of buyers to sellers), asymmetric information, deterrence strength, and the ratio of counterfeits. Cross-network externalities of platform make platform managers worry about potential exodus of buyers and sellers due to counterfeits. This externality provides platform with strong incentives to fight counterfeits by itself, even without external regulatory requirement. We further show that the higher the ratio of buyers to sellers, the lower the ratio of counterfeits. Moreover, a lower degree of information asymmetry or a higher degree of punishment can reduce the ratio of counterfeits. We suggest that governments and e-commerce platforms work together in the fight against counterfeiting.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Miao & Danxia Xie & Weiqiang Zhong, 2018. "Platform Externality, Asymmetric Information, and Counterfeit Deterrence in E-Commerce," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(14), pages 3209-3234, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:54:y:2018:i:14:p:3209-3234
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2017.1378639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1378639
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1378639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:54:y:2018:i:14:p:3209-3234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.