IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v49y2013i4p74-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Analysis of Business Cycle Synchronization and Shock Similarity Between Romania and the Eurozone

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Bojeşteanu Bobeica
  • Ana Simona Manu

Abstract

The paper aims to evaluate the degree of business cycle synchronization and the similarity of production structures between Romania and the eurozone, drawing a comparison with other new member states. Although there has been significant progress, business cycle correlation with the eurozone is still lower in Romania than in other regional peers. Moreover, the empirical evidence regarding the similarity of production structures reveals a widening gap vis-à-vis the eurozone during the transition period. The results suggest that it is less advisable for Romania to join the eurozone than for other countries in Central and Eastern Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Bojeşteanu Bobeica & Ana Simona Manu, 2013. "Empirical Analysis of Business Cycle Synchronization and Shock Similarity Between Romania and the Eurozone," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 74-97, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:49:y:2013:i:4:p:74-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=F287253251287537
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tudor Mugurel Aursulesei & Liviu - George Maha, 2020. "Dysfunctions Of The European Monetary Union," Junior Scientific Researcher, SC Research Publishing SRL, vol. 6(1), pages 82-91, May.
    2. RNuket Kirci Cevik & Sel Dibooglu & Ali M. Kutan, 2016. "Real and Financial Sector Studies in Central and Eastern Europe: A Review," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 66(1), pages 2-31, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:49:y:2013:i:4:p:74-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.