IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/challe/v62y2019i2p128-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequality and Stagnation by Policy Design: Mainstream Denialism and Its Dangerous Political Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Palley

Abstract

This important paper argues that the mainstream economics profession has utterly failed to address the financial crisis and ensuing stagnation. The author makes a direct assault on the defensiveness of mainstream economics today. To the contrary, he argues, mainstream policies contributed significantly to the economic shocks. Constructive critiques of policy have been made in light of events, but there has been overwhelming mainstream resistance to such ideas. This critique of mainstream economists is not about “values” or lack of “change.” It is about academic practice that suppresses ideas that are threatening to its survival.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Palley, 2019. "Inequality and Stagnation by Policy Design: Mainstream Denialism and Its Dangerous Political Consequences," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(2), pages 128-143, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:62:y:2019:i:2:p:128-143
    DOI: 10.1080/05775132.2019.1592843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/05775132.2019.1592843
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/05775132.2019.1592843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chrysovalantis Amountzias, 2024. "Market power and income disparities: How can firms influence the gap between capital and labor earnings," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(3), pages 861-888, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:62:y:2019:i:2:p:128-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCHA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.