IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/challe/v46y2003i4p71-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a Proposal to Reinstate the New York Stock Transfer Tax

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Pollin
  • James Heintz

Abstract

This report considers a proposal to reinstate the New York stock transfer tax (STT)that was phased out between 1979 and 1981. The proposal under consideration would reinstate the tax at half the rate that prevailed at the time of its repeal. The revenues from such a tax, at around $3.5 billion under current stock market conditions, would be shared equally by the governments of New York City and New York State.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Pollin & James Heintz, 2003. "Evaluation of a Proposal to Reinstate the New York Stock Transfer Tax," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 71-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:46:y:2003:i:4:p:71-105
    DOI: 10.1080/05775132.2003.11034213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/05775132.2003.11034213
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/05775132.2003.11034213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Heintz & Robert Pollin, 2003. "Confronting the New York Fiscal Crisis: Raising Revenue Through Taxing Stock Market Transactions," Research Briefs rb2003-4, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    2. Jonathan A. Schwabish, 2005. "Estimating Employment Spillover Effects In New York City with an Application to The Stock Transfer Tax," Public Finance Review, , vol. 33(6), pages 663-689, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:46:y:2003:i:4:p:71-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCHA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.