IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v73y2024i2p147-170n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rezeption ökonomischer Erkenntnis im Recht – vom Dialog zweier Nachbarwissenschaften

Author

Listed:
  • Ludwigs Markus

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht und Europarecht Würzburg Germany)

Abstract

This article examines the manifestations of and rules governing the transformation of economic standards into law from a legal dogmatic perspective. To do so, four steps are undertaken: In the first place, possible receptors of neighbouring scientific knowledge to migrate into law are identified. Following on from this, the question of the rules governing the transformation in such a process of juridification is raised. Specific examples of the reception of economic standards are then focused in a third step. The article examines the overall economic equilibrium enshrined in the German Basic Law, the dispute around the economic constitution, the model of competition policy in antitrust and regulatory law, the standard of cost efficiency in the network industries and the current shift towards more administration-driven regulation in the energy sector. A conclusion acknowledges the varying degrees of binding effects and argues for greater sensitivity towards interdisciplinary approaches in the legal methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludwigs Markus, 2024. "Rezeption ökonomischer Erkenntnis im Recht – vom Dialog zweier Nachbarwissenschaften," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 73(2), pages 147-170.
    • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:73:y:2024:i:2:p:147-170:n:1004
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2024-2011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2024-2011
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2024-2011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:73:y:2024:i:2:p:147-170:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.