IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v73y2024i2p114-124n1005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

4-Tage-Woche – Modell für die Arbeitswelt der Zukunft?: „4-Tage-Woche“ ist nicht gleich „4-Tage-Woche“

Author

Listed:
  • Altun Ufuk

    (ifaa – Institut für angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft e. V. Fachbereich Arbeitszeit und Vergütung Düsseldorf Germany)

Abstract

The debate about the “4-day week” has increased and now occupies a large part of company, economic and labour policy discussions. It is noticeable that various working time models are being discussed under the term “4-day week”, in which the weekly working time is spread over four days instead of five, or the weekly working time is reduced, and employees therefore work one day less per week. The aim of this article is to inform readers about the challenges and fields of action relating to the “4-day week” and to provide arguments and approaches for objectifying the discussions within and outside the company.

Suggested Citation

  • Altun Ufuk, 2024. "4-Tage-Woche – Modell für die Arbeitswelt der Zukunft?: „4-Tage-Woche“ ist nicht gleich „4-Tage-Woche“," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 73(2), pages 114-124.
    • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:73:y:2024:i:2:p:114-124:n:1005
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2024-2012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2024-2012
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2024-2012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:73:y:2024:i:2:p:114-124:n:1005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.