IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v57y2008i3p285-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sicherung privater Investitionen – ein geeignetes Instrument der Entwicklungshilfe?

Author

Listed:
  • Egger Peter

    (Universität München und Ifo Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Poschingerstraße 5, D-81679 München, Deutschland)

  • Freytag Andreas

    (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Carl- Zeiss-Str. 3, 07743 Jena)

  • Voll Sebastian

    (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Carl- Zeiss-Str. 3, 07743 Jena)

  • Harms Philipp

    (RWTH Aachen, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Templergraben 64/III, 52062 Aachen)

Abstract

Peter Egger’s paper provides a synthesis of findings with regard to the impact of bilateral as well as multilateral means of protection of cross-border direct investments in less developed countries and, in turn, on their economic growth. In particular, he focuses on the role of bilateral investment treaties and multilateral agreements such as the GATS in this regard. Previous empirical work identifies a significant positive impact of bilateral investment treaties on FDI. It suggests a similar impact of the GATS on FDI. He argues that these agreements contribute significantly to economic growth in less developed economies and countries in transition by spurring technology transfers through multinational activity of the developed countries in other economiesAndreas Freytag and Sebastian Voll emphasize the important role of adequate institutions both for investment and development. The question is, whether investment guarantees as insurance for political risks in the recipient country support economic development or not. Actually, the German Federal Republic is the leading warrantor for FDI-insurances on the world, but the benefiting countries are not the LDC’s. Using these warranties as an instrument of development policy in the future is content of actual political discussion. They argue that, in case of economies with weak domestic institutions, investment guarantees could provide disincentives for politicians in the target country to establish rule of law and good governance. On the other hand, investment guarantees could foster development by providing additional access to FDI, especially in emerging market economies with sufficient and improving institutional qualityPhilipp Harms points out while foreign direct investment (FDI) flows to developing countries and emerging markets have increased substantially in recent years, many low-income countries are still shunned by multinational firms. One of the key causes for this observation is the poor quality of institutions and an often precarious political environment in these countries. Given the benefits of FDI for host country productivity and income levels, it could thus be argued that protecting the security of property rights is an effective way of enhancing growth and prosperity in poor countries. While he agrees with this point of view, he argues that “traditional” forms of development aid can substantially contribute to an improved investment climate in developing countries. This argument is based on the notion that insecure property rights reflect distributional conflicts in the host country population, and that appropriate development support can shift agents’ distributional interests in favor of foreign firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Egger Peter & Freytag Andreas & Voll Sebastian & Harms Philipp, 2008. "Sicherung privater Investitionen – ein geeignetes Instrument der Entwicklungshilfe?," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 57(3), pages 285-314, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:57:y:2008:i:3:p:285-314
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2008-0304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2008-0304
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2008-0304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:57:y:2008:i:3:p:285-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.