IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v55y2006i1p92-124n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ausgestaltungsvarianten und ökonomische Konsequenzen einer 4. Hürde für die Erstattung von Arzneimitteln

Author

Listed:
  • Sundmacher Torsten

    (Universität Duisburg-Essen, Standort Duisburg, Fakultät 3 – Wirtschaftswissenschaft, Allgemeine Wirtschaftspolitik, Lotharstraße 1, D – 47048 Duisburg)

  • Jasper Jörg

    (Universität Hannover,Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Lehrstuhl Ordnungs- und Prozesspolitik, Königsworther Platz 1, 30167 Hannover)

Abstract

In this paper we examine different forms of a 4th hurdle for the reimbursement of pharmaceuticals, i.e. an economic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceuticals. This instrument is aimed to organize the decision on the reimbursement of pharmaceuticals more efficiently than it is currently the case in the German health care system where the market authorization of the product is normally sufficient for a product to be included into the benefits catalogue. Also the arrangement of the reimbursement price is economically problematic. Obviously, the way the instrument is designed is of paramount importance for the efficiency of a 4th hurdle. There are a lot of variations imaginable which yield very different results. In addition, the usefulness of the 4th hurdle must be assessed before the background of relevant politically enforceable alternatives. In this respect a properly arranged 4th hurdle is an improvement compared to the status quo. Indeed, it is for sure not the best conceivable regulation design for a liberalized pharmaceutical market in a statutory health insurance system.

Suggested Citation

  • Sundmacher Torsten & Jasper Jörg, 2006. "Ausgestaltungsvarianten und ökonomische Konsequenzen einer 4. Hürde für die Erstattung von Arzneimitteln," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 55(1), pages 92-124, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:55:y:2006:i:1:p:92-124:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2006-0106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2006-0106
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2006-0106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:55:y:2006:i:1:p:92-124:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.