IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev4rl/v1y2010ip283-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ASPECTE TEORETICE SI PRACTICE PRIVIND REJUDECAREA PERSOANELOR JUDECATE IN LIPSA - THEORY AND LEGAL PRACTICE CONCERNING THE RETRAIL FOR JUDGMENT IN ABSENTIA (Romanian version)

Author

Listed:
  • Conf. univ. dr. Mihaela Laura Pamfil

    (Universitatea Petre Andrei din Iasi)

Abstract

The right to apply for a retrial of the case and to be present at the judgment are one of the most important guarantees for the person who is the subject of an European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of executing a sentence or a detention order imposed by a decision rendered in absentia. The right to apply for a retrial had been issued by the 2002/584/JHA Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 and had been inforce in the Romanian Penal Procedure Code in 2003. According to the dispositions of the art. 5221, a persoan who was judged in absentia had the right to to apply for a retrial of the case and to be present at the judgment. Thanks to the summary regulation of the proceedings, the legal practice faced some difficulties to apply the legal text. Another problem raised by this legal text is the discrimination made between the defendants rendered in absentia which have not been arrested under a European arrest warrant and those which have been subject of this kind of warrant. The main aim of this paper is to analyze the proceeding regulated by the art. 5221 and to offer a suggestion for the improving the legal text.

Suggested Citation

  • Conf. univ. dr. Mihaela Laura Pamfil, 2010. "ASPECTE TEORETICE SI PRACTICE PRIVIND REJUDECAREA PERSOANELOR JUDECATE IN LIPSA - THEORY AND LEGAL PRACTICE CONCERNING THE RETRAIL FOR JUDGMENT IN ABSENTIA (Romanian version)," Jurnalul de Studii Juridice, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics on Behalf of Petre Andrei University Iasi, vol. 1, pages 283-291, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:1:y:2010:i::p:283-291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jls.upa.ro/ro/arhiva-revista.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    retrail; judgement in absentia; decision rendered in absentia; the right to defence; extradition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • K36 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Family and Personal Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:1:y:2010:i::p:283-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jls.upa.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.