Author
Listed:
- Maryna Prepotenska
(National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor S ikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Instituteâ€)
- Liudmyla Ovsiankina
(Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University)
- Tetiana Smyrnova
(Kharkiv I.P.Kotlarevsky National University of Arts)
- Olha Rasskazova
(Municipal institution "Kharkiv Humanitarian and Pedagogical Academy" of the Kharkiv regional council)
- Lidiia Cherednyk
(National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine)
- Maksym Doichyk
(Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University)
Abstract
The problem of tolerance is analyzed against the background of the acute challenges of today and transformation of humanities from antiquity to postmodernism. Tolerance-related definitions arose in philosophy are examined retrospectively: patience, tolerance, respect, trust, harmony in diversity. The methodological significance of the integrative interdisciplinary prism in consideration of the phenomenon of tolerance is shown. Three leading sociocultural and communicative strategies of tolerance in social agreements have been identified: tolerant internal dialogue (agreement with oneself), tolerant communication with the world (worldview tolerance), tolerant interpersonal communication (important social agreements). The limits of tolerance are outlined, beyond which it becomes quasi-tolerance, because behind the simulacrum of tolerance hides indifference, conformism of communicators, or sprouts of intolerance, aggression, mobbing. With the help of sociological and synergetic theories the idea of balance of tolerance in psychological, mental and spiritual, physical aspects of human existence is defended. Autotolerance is due to human self-knowledge, sound self-esteem, developed mental and emotional quotient (EQ), and under such conditions it strategically determines a tolerant dialogue with the world, a constructive worldview. In turn, it needs critical thinking and an ecological attitude to information, especially in the context of media manipulation and phubbing. The simulacrum of modern pop literature on positive thinking is outlined, in contrast to which the life-creating potential of practical philosophy is revealed, which contributes to creation of socio-cultural and communicative communities.
Suggested Citation
Maryna Prepotenska & Liudmyla Ovsiankina & Tetiana Smyrnova & Olha Rasskazova & Lidiia Cherednyk & Maksym Doichyk, 2022.
"Tolerance as a Communicative and Socio-Cultural Strategy of Social Agreements,"
Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 13(1), pages 291-312, January.
Handle:
RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:291-312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1/397
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:291-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.