Author
Listed:
- Tetiana Koberska
(National University of Water Management and Nature Resources Use, Rivne, Ukraine)
- Tetiana Panfilova
(Lviv Regional Institute of Public Administration of the National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine)
- Olha Kryhina
(Mariupol State University, Mariupol, Ukraine)
- Jia Ren
(National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv Ukraine)
- Vasyl Zinkevych
(Drogobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drogobych, Ukraine)
Abstract
Changes in society lead to changes in science, changing its fundamental foundations - ideological and value, methodological and instrumental foundations. In turn, a change in the scientific paradigm leads to social change. A situation of this kind is especially evident in the socio-political sciences, since it is they who are more affected by social reality. The nature of postmodern societies is such that its economic component generates a huge number of subcultures, in the scientific world it is called "subcultural explosion." Postmodern societies are societies of permanent changes: consumer standards, moral values, political structure, and so on, repeatedly change during the life of one generation, significantly affect the search for the truth of science and its understanding. In the list of various questions of truth, its character, origin, postmodern departs from objective truth, therefore it becomes contextual and consensus. Theories are replaced by approaches, views, points of view, thoughts. Scientific concepts with their strict certainty change concepts, in which under the same name everyone puts their own meaning and essence. According to this, in postmodernism, not only the scientific paradigm as a model of scientific activity is changing, but the purpose of science, its understanding as a special activity with the search for truth, is changing. This implies a review of the attitude to the "organizational forms" of science, that is, the way in which scientific knowledge is disseminated to the professional scientific community to search for truth, which in its classical understanding no longer exists.
Suggested Citation
Tetiana Koberska & Tetiana Panfilova & Olha Kryhina & Jia Ren & Vasyl Zinkevych, 2021.
"Historical Evolution of Knowledge: Interpretation of Truth in Postmodernism,"
Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1Sup1), pages 215-227, April.
Handle:
RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:12:y:2021:i:1sup1:p:215-227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1Sup1/280
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:12:y:2021:i:1sup1:p:215-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.