IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev2rl/v31y2010ip77-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social economy in Romania. Preliminary approach (English version)

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel ARPINTE

    (Graduated the Faculty of Sociology and Social Work at the University of Bucharest. He is a PhD student in sociology and works currently as a research fellow at The Research Institute for Quality of Life, at the Romanian Academy)

  • Sorin CACE

    (Senior researcher, Institute for Quality of Life Research (ICCV), Romanian Academy, Calea 13 Septembrie, no 13, sector 5, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Stefan COJOCARU

    (Ass. Profesor, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Department of Sociology and Social Work, Blv.Carol I, no. 11, Iasi, director Holt Romania – Iasi, Childhood and Parenting Research Center)

Abstract

During the past 20 years, social economy became a subject of interest because its organisations had to assume an increasing role in the production and supply of social goods and services of public interest. In Romania, although forms of social economy existed for a very long time in society, we can not speak of an institutionally or juridical determined area, with actual outputs. This study5 shows the stage of social economy development taking into consideration three forms of social economy which are present in Romania: the cooperatives, the non-governmental organisations and the mutual aid organisations. The three types of organisations have a low potential for social economy activities. There is no specific legislative framework which to encourage the development of social economy activities, while the availability of the public institutions to support the organisations addressing the vulnerable groups is very limited. The cases in which the three forms of social economy address directly the higher employment of the disadvantaged groups are rather isolated. As a general characteristic, except for the NGOs, the other types of social economy organisations address indirectly the disadvantaged groups, without any kind of coherent supply of services.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel ARPINTE & Sorin CACE & Stefan COJOCARU, 2010. "Social economy in Romania. Preliminary approach (English version)," Revista de cercetare si interventie sociala, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 31, pages 77-85, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev2rl:v:31:y:2010:i::p:77-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rcis.ro/ro/section1/41-volumul-312010decembrie/321-social-economy-in-romania-preliminary-approach.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Gabriel BURCEA, 2014. "Quality Of Life Of Vulnerable Groups Involved In Informal Waste Management Sector: A Critical Literature Review," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 286-294, June.
    2. Vladimir-Aurelian ENACHESCU & Vlad ROªCA, 2014. "Educational Counseling Approach for the Romanian Educational System," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(3), pages 321-333, July.
    3. Amalia Petrovici, 2013. "Social economy and social entrepreneurship: An exercise of social responsibility," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 4, pages 3-15.
    4. Laura Tufa, 2011. "Discrimination and discourse: An expert interviewing approach," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 1, pages 5-23.
    5. Vladimir-Aurelian ENACHESCU & Donna TARABAY, 2016. "Internet is Changing Cultures," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(3), pages 272-278, July.
    6. Iulian Stanescu, 2011. "Social economy: Characteristics and needs for development," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 3, pages 69-92.
    7. Cace, Sorin & Simona, Stanescu, 2013. "Role of the Social Economy to Increase Social Inclusion," MPRA Paper 85360, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Cristina Tomescu & Florin Botonogu, 2011. "The Roma: Inclusion through social economy," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 1, pages 93-111.
    9. Stefan Stefanescu, 2011. "The deprived social cathegories: Necessary support in the population's perception," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 1, pages 48-70.
    10. Laura Iosif & Cristina Teodora Preoteasa & Elena Preoteasa & Ana Ispas & Radu Ilinca & Cǎtǎlina Murariu-Mǎgureanu & Oana Elena Amza, 2021. "Oral Health Related Quality of Life and Prosthetic Status among Institutionalized Elderly from the Bucharest Area: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-10, June.
    11. Daniel Arpinte & Laura Tufa, 2011. "Social economy: Forms and types of organization," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 2, pages 78-105.
    12. Sorin I. Blaga, 2020. "A Review Of Romanian Social Entrepreneurship And Further Research Agenda," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 15(4), pages 7-24, december.
    13. Stefan Gabriel BURCEA, 2014. "The Social Enterprise - Viable Mechanism of Social Integration for Romanian Vulnerable Groups," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(5), pages 613-625, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social economy; mutual aid; cooperatives; non-profit organisations; mutual aid organisations; vulnerable groups; social inclusion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • P48 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Legal Institutions; Property Rights; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Regional Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev2rl:v:31:y:2010:i::p:77-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rcis.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.