IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev17s/v1y2011ip31-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bune Practici in Economia Sociala – Metode si Indicatori de Evaluare - Good Practices in Social Economy – Methods and Indicators of Evaluation (Romanian version)

Author

Listed:
  • Corina CACE

    (Associate Professor Ph.D., Head of Teacher Training Department, Academy of Economic Studies)

  • Sorin CACE

    (Senior Researcher Ph.D. Sorin CACE, Institute for Quality of Life Research (ICCV))

  • Victor NICOLAESCU

    (Associate Lecturer Ph.D. Victor NICOLAESCU, Faculty of Social Work and Sociology within “Petre Andrei” University from Iasi)

Abstract

“Evaluation” and „good practices” can be found and analyzed in detail on the wide realm of interdisciplinary and social fields, which requires a brief definition in order to maintain the rigor and clarity, but also an analysis of those conceptual areas which study the relationship between the projects implementation and assessing their results. Transfer of best practices in the social economy has the objective to interconnect the positive results at the level of the national social partnership from the European Union countries in this field by organizing seminars, round tables and symposia, exchange of best practices, study visits and publishing of working principles, manuals, and guides. This analysis presents several methods and indicators that constitute the basic elements of the researchers involved in mapping the positive practices of social economy. To achieve this goal, a desk-research was conducted based on the evaluation projects in this field and especially on the methodological approaches used.

Suggested Citation

  • Corina CACE & Sorin CACE & Victor NICOLAESCU, 2011. "Bune Practici in Economia Sociala – Metode si Indicatori de Evaluare - Good Practices in Social Economy – Methods and Indicators of Evaluation (Romanian version)," Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Stiinte Sociale/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Social Sciences, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 1, pages 31-51, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev17s:v:1:y:2011:i::p:31-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://edituralumen.ro
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    good practices; social economy; methods; indicators;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev17s:v:1:y:2011:i::p:31-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edituralumen.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.