IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/jsmijo/v1y2018i1p23-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logical Errors in Boycotting the Family Referendum of 2018 in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Raluca Purcaru

    (Universitatea Apollonia, Iasi)

Abstract

The paper analyses a series of arguments that had as purpose to convince the population not to go to vote in the Referendum of October 2018 organized in Romania about redefining marriage as possible only between different sexes. As the law requested a 30% presence to be validated, the arguments final purpose was not to operate the constitutional changes. But a series of arguments, as convincing as they were, were not correct from a logical and philosophical point of view, as they led astray from the participation to the democratic vote process, the civic implication in establishing the rights of the citizen and refocused public attention from the question in order on the different political and religious organizations. The paper discusses the details.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Raluca Purcaru, 2018. "Logical Errors in Boycotting the Family Referendum of 2018 in Romania," Journal for Social Media Inquiry, Editura Lumen, vol. 1(1), pages 23-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:jsmijo:v:1:y:2018:i:1:p:23-30
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/jsmi/article/view/1309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    human rights; marriage; ideology; homosexuality; democracy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:jsmijo:v:1:y:2018:i:1:p:23-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/jsmi/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.